01-03-1967 - 06-27-1967 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CITY OF RIVERSIDE January 3, 1~67 Relating to the filling of the irrigation oipe line with concrete, the original requirement is to be met or a certificate is to be furnished by the soil engineer on the Tract that the presence of the pipe does not consti- tute a hazard to buildings ~n the Tract. Relating to the Training Dikes, it was the determination of the City Council that the condition be left in the items to be completed. Relating to the completion of Grading Plans, the deter- minanion of the City Council was that the requirement remain in effe£t~ Relating to the Incidentals, the City Council requested an itemized report to be brought back to the City Council at the time the report is submitted on the drainage boxes and curb requirement. 10:00 A~M.--Hearing was called relative to the Appeal of Mrs. Patty 3. Breashears from the decision of the Board of Zoning Adjustment in approving the request of Frank J~ Miller and F~reman's Fund Insurance Company of San Francisco, Calif- ornia, Zoning Case V-15-667, for a Variance to construct, use and maintain an offzce buildmng, portions of which will extend above the height limit of the zone, subject to the recommendations of the Planning Commission, on the seven lots :am 5495, 5507, 5515, 5521, 5555 and 5559 Arlington ~veuue, Ismtuated on the northerly side of Arlington Avenue 255 feet leasterly of Phoenix Avenue, in Zone R-1-65, with Zone RO lhaving been approved by the adoption of Ordinance No. 3417 lot December 20, 1966~ The communication from the Board of IZonmng Ad3ustmenu sta[ed that the Board, by a vote of 3 ayes Ito g noes, recommended approval of the recuest subject to theI Ifollowing conditions: (1) The proposed building shall not lexaeed 40 feet in height; (2) The location and design of the I building shall be substantially as sho~ on the plot plan on Ifile with this case; and (3) The granting of this Variance Idoes not excuse compliance with all applicable rules and Iragulations of laws and ordinances. The Planning Director I presented departmental recommendations together with maps of Ithe area~ No one was present desmring no speak in favor of Ithe Appeal. Interested persons were present to speak in lopposition to the granting of the Appeal. No writ[en protests lwere presented. Following discussion, the hearing was offi- Icially closed and the Appeal was denied. IA communication was presented from Ernest N. Webb of Albert A~ IWabb Associates, on behalf of Firefund Service Corporation, Idevelopers of property covered under Zoning Case R-9-645, I Record of Survey 979 and covered under Variance V-15 667, Irequesting a waiver of the 30-day wamting period to permit I the issuance of a Building Permit, for the properties at 15495, 5507, 5515, 5521, 5555 and 5559 Arlington Avenue, I action having been contmnued to this date by thc City Council lot December 20, 1966; whereupon, the request for waiver of the 30-day waiting period was granted, and permission was given for the issuance of a Building Permit, with the under- standing that it be placed on the face of the Permit that this is an the owner's own risk until the effective date of Ordinance No. 3417. Second ~,X 52-171