Laserfiche WebLink
Redistricting Report • Page 2 <br />and referred the redistricting criteria and alternatives to the Governmental Affairs Committee (now <br />known as the Inclusiveness, Community Engagement, and Governmental Processes Committee): <br />1. Equalize the population count in each Ward within 10% (top to bottom) <br />2. Achieve ±5% from optimal population per Ward <br />3. Comply with all applicable laws <br />4. Avoid disqualification of City Councilmembers during a term <br />5. Maintain continuity of existing Wards, to the extent possible <br />6. Draw Wards that are compact and contiguous <br />7. Use natural, geographic boundaries to the extent possible <br />8. Maintain cohesive neighborhoods and community interests, to the extent possible <br />9. Consider school districts and avoid dividing same, to the extent possible <br />10. Maintain income diversity within Wards, to the extent possible <br />That Committee had the responsibility of developing alternatives for City Council consideration. <br />The staff redistricting team consisted of the City Clerk, City Attorney, City Manager, Chief <br />Information Officer, and Community Development Director observing a timeline of approximately <br />one year (December 2011 to October 2012) conducting public meetings, workshops, review of <br />draft maps. The City Council adopted the final redistricting map in November 2012, with the <br />adoption of the ordinance. <br />In January 2020, AB 849, known as the "Fair and Inclusive Redistricting for Municipalities and <br />Political Subdivisions Act" or "Fair Maps Act," went into effect, which specifies the criteria and <br />deadlines for cities and counties to adopt or adjusting new district (ward) boundaries. The Fair <br />Maps Act also defines the hearing procedures that would allow the public to provide input on the <br />placement of boundaries and proposed boundary maps. The Fair Maps Act requires the governing <br />body to take specified steps to encourage the residents of local jurisdictions to participate in the <br />redistricting process. <br />DISCUSSION: <br />Overview of Procedural Requirements for Redistricting <br />Riverside City Charter Section 402 requires City Council, by an ordinance, to divide the city <br />boundaries into seven wards, review the boundaries of those wards every ten years, and adjust, <br />by ordinance, those boundaries to provide for substantially equal number of residents in each <br />ward. The resulting redistricting ordinance becomes effective thirty days after it is adopted. The <br />existing ward boundaries are to be used until new ward boundaries are established by that <br />redistricting ordinance. Under California Election Code Division 21, Chapter 7, Article 2, new <br />wards established generally cannot be changed until after the next decennial census, in 2031. <br />However, Riverside City Charter states that ward boundary adjustments may occur more <br />frequently as determined necessary upon receipt of official census data. <br />The California Fair Maps Act sets forth new map criteria requirements which are different from <br />the criteria adopted by the City Council in 2011. To the greatest extent practicable, the City is <br />required to adopt district boundaries using the criteria in the following order of priority: <br />1. Council wards shall be geographically contiguous. <br />2. The geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or local community of interest should <br />be respected and included within a single ward for its effective and fair representation in <br />