02-24-1981 CC MINUTES - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CITY OF RIVERSIDE COUNCi LME N February 24, 1981 ......................................................... 1___Z ~Ad~iniat~ator in denyin~ their rsqu~t for a ~esidential Development Pez~tt for the :proposed division of approx=Lmately 29.85 acres of la~d ~to 3~ lot~ ~t~ate~ o~ the :~outhe~te~iy cone~ o~ ~ez ~a~l ~ve and ~te~ate ~ve~ue, Ca~e ~8-31-789. ,c unication was presented fr~ the appell~t reques~in~ penisslot to withdraw the appeal because the ~racc has n~ quallfl~ for a Residential Development Pe~i~ based ~clon :X: son =he 1981 sewer allocation. ~e City Council granted the request, and =he appeal Second swas withdraw. All Ayes :Co~ct~n Shepard entered at this c~e. :PROPOS~ ET TO ~ HOUSI~ E~T OF ~ G~ P~ - ~E GP-~801 - CO~. ~3:00 P.M.--HearinS was call~ co couider the proposed men~enc co the existinS ~Ho~inS Elmeric of the City of Riverside Gener~ Pi~ in its entirety by adoptin8 a ,revised Ho~inS Elmeric docket which has been prepar~ pursuant ~o revisions in the Sta=e of Califor~a RousinS Elmen= Guidelines. ~ heretofore directed by the City :Council, =he minutes of the City PlaninS C~ssion pertaininS ~o this case are on ~file and are a part of the evidence submitted ac nhis hearing, whether or not any :pot=ion Chereof is read or discussed. ~e comunicacion fr~ the City Pla~in~ C~- :mission s=aned than =he C~ission, by a vote of 7 ayes =o 0 noes, approv~ the re- ~vised Ho~inS Ei~= inco~oraninS the City HousinS Comicnee-recomended thanSea, ,the PlaninS Comission Subc~iCCee chatSea reSardinS condo~ni~ conversions, =he :letter fr~ the State Depar~en= of HousinS and Cmnity Developant with the City :staff response, and the le:ner reSardinS handicapped housinS. ~e cmunica=ion fr~ 'the Environethel Protection ~ission advised than the Comission, by a vote of 5 ~ayes ~o 0 noes and I abstention, danemined tha= :he draft Enviro~en=al.I~acn Report :for the draft revised HousinS Eleenc of the Ci~y's General Plan is adequte, and =ha= :=he HousinS Elment will noc ~ve a siSnificanc adverse enviro~en=al effect. ~e ~PlanninS Director presenn~ deparmencal recom~danions, and answered questions fr~ ~che City Co~cii. Principal Pl~ner ~yld briefly described the proposed HousinS Ele- ~men: and the revi~ process co dace, and presented deparm~=al reco~endacions. ~. ~=hie Wesnley, representinS the bcal G~e~ental Relations Cmiccee of the :Realcors of Riverside, discussed the proposal, and spoke in opposici~ =o portions of 'it Questions were answered by Mr. ~yld and Che PlanninS Director. No other procests,~ ~iCcen or oral, were presented. Foll~inS discussion, =he City Council (1) upheld the ~Enviro~ental Protection Co~ission findinE chac ~he Enviro~en=al Impact Report on tHousinS Ellen= is adequate and ~hat this progr~ would not have a siSnificanc adverse effect on the enviro~enc; and (2) adopted =he HousinS El~enc as reckended by the ;City Pla~inS Comission except for Policies E1 and E2 and Specific ~=ion El.1 reEard- ~inE cond~ini~ conversions (paEes 196 and 196(a) of Revised Chapter 3); and (3) con- cinued the public hearin8 on =ha~ portion of :he proposal =o ~y 5, 1981, at 1:30 p.m., ~o all~ adequate C~e for the City Pla~inE C~ssion Co conclude ins public henritE ,on a r~ised cond~ini~ conversion ordinance, and enable the City Council =o concur- ~rently review all matters relative =o condomini~ conversions a= that meetinS. Fur=her,~ Motion ,X the City An:omey was requesced ~o prepare che appropriate resolution for adoption of Second X, the portions of the ~ended HousinS El~enc approved in (2) above. All Ayes ZO~ C~E R-37-801 - 4600 B~ ~ P~ ~E - ~ZONING - CONTI~ 3:00 P.M.--HearinS was called on the proposal of =he City of ~verside, ZoninS Case iR-37-801, =o place the appr~imacely .61 acre of vacant land situated an the south- ~wescerly ce~inus of BubblinS Wells ~ad and adjacent to the southwesterly property ,line of =hose lots in the 4600 block of h Paz hne situated on :he sounhwesEerly side 'of ~ Paz ~ne, in Zone O and r~ove =he sme from Zone R-1-65. ~ heretofore directed ~by =he City Council, =he m~u=es of che City PlanninS Cmission pertaininS ~o this ~case are on file and are a part of che evidence submitted an this hearinS, whether or 'noc any porcion thereof is read or discussed. ~e cmnica=ion fr~ the City Plan- 'nit C~ission stated C~n the Comission, by a vote of 7 ayes to 0 noes, approved ~Zone O, subjec= no the follyinS conditions: (1) ~ere shall be a two-year C~e l~it 'in which ~o satisfy the followinS conditions and finalize this action. If the zoninM 'is , not adopted within ~o years of the dace of introduction of the ordinance, the ~acEion ~aken on this pecicion shall be void. A =~e extension of not more than one ~year may be requested of the City Council by lacier. Such time ~cension request must 'be ~ received by the Cl=y Clerk thirty days prior ~o the end of =he ~o-year l~ic; and ~(2) ~e zoninE bounda~ between Zone 0 and Zone R-1-65 will be based upon a revised 66-369