|
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
<br />
<br /> COUNCI LME N
<br />
<br /> ',~',, ',~,, ', ,,, ',, ',,
<br />...................................................... ,~z ,~, ·. z..98..~ ................................. .W..A_%D_S... :,.,_',_z_'_, ~.,.,,_,_,,.,,_~.,:7_,_,
<br /> ~for a revised conditional use permit to legalize an existing commercial coach, expand ,
<br /> :classroom area and to construct a six-foot block wall within the church property
<br /> :located at 5320 Victoria Avenue, situated on the easterly side of Victoria Avenue
<br /> northerly of Central Avenue, in Zone R-1-125; and determined that the proposal would
<br /> ~not have a significant adverse enviroamental effect. It was detez~ined that ~he City
<br /> Council would not set the matter for public hearing.
<br /> iCITY PLANNING COMHISSION AND ~IRON~LT~A1. PROTECTION COZ~[ISSION
<br /> :
<br /> ~THE SPRINGS - REVIEW OF DRAFT EIR PREPARED BY COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE - LOCATED IN
<br /> {UNINCORPORATED SUNNYMEAD-EDGEMONT AREA
<br /> CoY~nunications were presented from the City Planning Commission and the Environmental
<br /> Protection Comission advising of the Commissions' recommendations relative to the
<br /> draft Environmental Impact Report prepared by the County of Riverside for an approxi-
<br /> mately 311-acre proposed regional shopping center and industrial park located in the
<br /> unincorporated Sunnymead-Edgemont area, generally bounded by State Route 60 on the
<br /> north, Day Street on the east, Eucalyptus Avenue on the south and 1-15E on the west,
<br /> as follows: (1) On April 22, 1982, the City Planning Co--.ission, by a vote of 6 ayes
<br /> to 0 noes, approved the staff reco.wnendation that the final EIR should (a) contain an
<br /> expanded analysis of the effects of this project on traffic circulation along City
<br /> streets, including Central, Alessandro and Pennsylvania Avenues and Box Springs Boule-
<br /> =yard, and (b) more clearly define the expected impacts of this project on future
<br /> retail sales growth of existing commercial development, particularly at Tyler Mall and
<br /> the Riverside Plaza; and (2) On April 14, 1982, the Environmental Protection Commis-
<br /> {sion, by a vote of 8 ayes to 0 noes, adopted the staff recommendation that the final
<br /> {EIR should (a) contain an expanded analysis of the effects of this project on traffic
<br /> {circulation along City streets, including Central, Alessandro and Pennsylvania Avenues
<br /> %and Box Springs Boulevard, (b) more clearly define the expected impacts of this project
<br /> ~on retail sales growth of the existing commercial development, particularly at Tyler
<br /> ]Mall and the Riverside Plaza; and further determined that the final EIR should
<br /> ~(c) elaborate on the cumulative impact of this project on solid waste disposal in the
<br /> ~area, and (d) address the off-site impacts of this project on wildlife in a cumulative
<br /> ~fashion. The Comissions' recommendations were upheld by the City Council, and the
<br /> {City staff was authorized to forward these recommendations to the County of Riverside
<br /> Board of Supervisors for their consideration.
<br /> iPLANNING DEPARTMENT
<br /> ,
<br /> ,
<br /> {TIME EXTENSION ON CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ZONING CASE R-22-790
<br /> {A communication was presented from Ronald Dobson requesting a one-year time extension
<br /> %from November 27. 1981, in which to complete the conditions of approval under Zoning
<br /> {Case R-22-790, being two lots containing a combined area of approximately .37 acre of
<br /> land situated on the northwesterly corner of Arlington and San Diego Avenues, located
<br /> ,at 3543 and 3547 Arlington Avenue. Petition for a zone change was granted on Novem-
<br /> {ber 27, 1979, and this {s the first request for a time extension. The City Council
<br /> granted the time extension to N0v~ber 27, 1982, retr0active to November 27, 1981.
<br />
<br />TIME EXTENSION ON CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ZONING CASE R-52-723
<br />A communication was presented from Kathryn Anne da Silva requesting a one-year time
<br />extension from 3uly 3, 1982, in which to complete the conditions of approval under
<br />Zoning Case R-52-723, for property located in the 3800 and 3900 blocks of Polk Street.
<br />Petition for a zone change was granted on July 3, 1973, and this is the eighth request
<br />for a time extension. The City Council granted the time extension to 3uly 3, 1983, as
<br />requested.
<br />
<br />PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
<br />
<br />:TIME EXTENSION - TRACT 9200-1
<br />%A Time Extension Request was presented from Standard-Pacific Corporation requesting an
<br />%iS-month extension of time to complete the off-site improvements required for Tract
<br />~9200-1, located at Saratoga and Fox Streets; together with a Memo from the Public
<br />{Works Department advising that this tract was adopted on April 7, 1981, and this is
<br />%the first request for a time extension. Off-site construction has started but is not
<br />% mplete. The Department has on file bonds and agreement in a sufficient amount to
<br />co
<br />,cover the installation of all required off-site improvements; and reconunends that the
<br />
<br />67-427
<br />
<br />
<br />
|