|
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
<br />
<br /> COUNCI LME N
<br />
<br /> Minutes of Regular Meeting of the City Council ~( ~, ~
<br /> Date of Meeting: January 26, 1982
<br /> ', ',, ',, ',,
<br /> Time of Meeting: 3:00 P.M.
<br /> Place of Meeting: Council ~ambec, City ~1 WARDS ~2~3~4~5~0~7~
<br />...........................................................................................................................
<br /> , .......
<br /> ',X'A'
<br /> ~Roll Call: Present , ,X',X',X~X~X',
<br />
<br />=The Invocation was given by the Rev. Mike Hopkins, Church of Religious Science.
<br />
<br />~The Pledge of Allegiance was given to the Flag.
<br />
<br />~ MINUTES
<br />[The Minutes of the Meeting of January 19, 1982, were approved as submitted.
<br />
<br />~PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AT 3:00 P.M.
<br />
<br />~ZONING ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN ANNEXATION NO. 52--PALMYRITA-GAGE II
<br />3:00 P.M.--Hearing was called on the zoning to be placed on the property located in
<br />proposed Annexation No. 52--Palmyrita-Gage II, relating to approximately 20 acres of
<br />land in the Highgrove area, lying westerly of and including the Gage Canal, northerly
<br />of PalmyflEa Avenue and southerly of Springbrook Wash. The zoning will become effec-
<br />tive upon its annexation to the City of Riverside. The hearing was opened and pro-
<br />ceeded with. As heretofore directed by the City Council, the minutes of the City
<br />Planning Co~nission and the Environmental Protection Commission pertaining to this
<br />matter are on file and are a part of the evidence submitted at this hearing, whether
<br />or not any portion thereof is read or discussed. The communication from the City
<br />Planning Commission stated that the Co~lssion, by a vote of 8 ayes to 0 noes, approved
<br />Zone MP, which is consistent with the land Use Element of the City of Riverside General
<br />Plan. The communication from the Environmental Protection Commission stated that the
<br />!Con~nission, by a vote of 8 ayes to 0 noes, determined that the rezoning of the area to
<br />'Zone MP would not have a significant adverse environmental effect. The Planning
<br />:Director presented departmental recommendations, together with maps of the area. No
<br />~one was present wishing to speak on the -mEter. No written protests were p~esented.
<br />~Following discussion, the public hearing was officially closed. The City Council
<br />;adopted the staff report and the environmental assessment as findings and determined
<br />~that application of Zone MP to the area in proposed Annexation No. 52 would not have a
<br />=significant adverse environmental effect; Zone M~ was approved unconditionally, to be
<br />~effective upon annexation of the area to the City of Riverside; and an ordinance
<br />~entitled, "An Ordinance of the City of Riverside, California, Amending Chapter 19.06
<br />~of the Riverside Municipal Code to Place the Area Known as 'City of Riverside LAFC
<br />~81-41-5 (Annexation No. 52--PalmyflEa-Gage II)' in the Manufacturing Park (MP) Zone,"
<br />~was presented and introduced.
<br />
<br />~ANNEXATION NO. 52--PAi~ITA-GAGE II
<br />~3:00 P.M.--Hearing was called to consider the desirability of annexing the proposed
<br />BPalmyrita-Gage II annexation area, proposed Annexation No. 52, consisting of approxi-
<br />emately 20 acres of land in the Highgrove area, lying westerly of and including the
<br />[Gage Canal, northerly of Palmytits Avenue and southerly of Springbrook Wash. The
<br />~hearing was opened and proceeded with. As heretofore directed by the City Council,
<br /> the minutes of the City Plannin~ C0mmi~gi0n and the Environmental Protection Commission
<br /> pertaining ~o this matter are on file and are a part of the evidence submitted at this
<br /> hearing, whether or not any portion thereof is read or discussed. TEe co~nunication
<br /> from the City Planning Commission stated that the Commission, by a vote of 8 ayes to
<br /> 0 noes, recommended approval of the annexation, application of Zone MP to the property,
<br /> and withdrawal of the area from the Highgrove Lighting District. The communication
<br /> from the Environmental Protection Co~ission stated that the Commission, by a vote of
<br />8 ayes to 0 noes, determined that the annexation of the area to the City of Riverside
<br />would not have a significant adverse environmental effect. The Planning Director
<br />~presented maps of the area, together with departmental recommendations. No protests,
<br />~written or oral, were presented. No one was present wishing to speak on the matter.
<br />~Following discussion, the hearing was officially closed. The City Council adopted the
<br />~staff report and the environmental assessment as findings and determined that the
<br />~annexation would not have a significant adverse environmental effect; the recommenda-
<br />~tions of the City Planning Commission were approved as presented; the annexation was
<br />approved; and the following actions were taken:
<br />
<br />MotiOn
<br />Second
<br />All Ayes
<br />
<br />Motion
<br />Second
<br />All Ayes
<br />
<br />67-283
<br />
<br />
<br />
|