|
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
<br />
<br /> COUNCI LME N
<br />
<br />................................................... F~bruarZ 7~ 198~ WARD5
<br />
<br /> ~approx~u~ately ~.26 acres of land partially developed with a residence a~d partially
<br /> ~vacanC, situated on the east side of Canyon Crest Drive opposite its iGCersecCion with
<br /> ~onte Vista D~ive, in Zones R-3-S-1 and R-3-S-2; and determined Chat the proposal
<br /> ~wo~ld not have a significaat adverse environ~enta~ e£fect. k vas decem~ed chac the
<br /> C~cy Co~c~ vouZd noc sec the ~cce= ~o= p~b~c
<br />
<br /> }A co~un~cac~ uas p=eseaced ~=om C~e C~Cy ~aa~8 C~ss~on adv~s~
<br /> }3~u~ Zg, Z98~, the ~ss~o~ considered the =equesc o~ the Co~cy
<br /> ~se Gg-Z2-834, ~o= t deCem~aac~o~ Chic (Z) acquisition o~ c~o parcels
<br /> ~3490 TeaCh SC=eec ~o= use as ~c? ~ove~e~C o~ces; ~nd (2) sa~e of ~Cy-o~ed
<br /> p=ope=C? ac the northeast co~e= of ~eZ~Ch aGd L~e Streets ~o= use as a
<br /> ~co~e=c~a~ development ~s ~ co~o~ce ~ch the C~cy o~ ~ve~s~de Gene=aZ ~a~
<br /> ~Use E~emeaC (~co~ ~ln); and, by a vote o~ 5 ayes Co 0 noes, (~) dece~aed
<br /> (a) the proposed Co~Cy o~ ~ve=s~de acq~s~C~oa o~ p=ope=c~es sc 3~26 aad 3490 Teach
<br /> ~$C=eec ~o= ~se as Co~cy ~ove=~c ~c~es ~ consistent ~ch the C~cy~s Ge~e=aZ
<br /> ~a (Do~co~ B~), and (b) the pco~sed sale by the Co~cy o~ ~ve=s~de o~ app=ox~-
<br /> emace~y .72 acre ac the Go=Cheasce=~y co~er o~ ~e~Ch a~ L~me Streets for
<br /> deve~opm~c v~ch c~e=c~ uses ~s ~oC co~s~sce~c ~ch the C~Cy~s Ge~e=a~ e~a~ (Do~-
<br /> ~o~ ~an); a~d (2) =eco~e~ded C~C the ~C? ~de~c~y equ~vl~e~C =ep~ac~e~C
<br /> ~o= chac ~os~ ~Gde= the proposed property sa~e so as co avo~ a poce~C~a~
<br /> sho=CaBe ~a the ~u~=e. ~e C~cy ~c~Z upheld the ~ss~o~s =eco~e~dac~ons,
<br /> sc~ ~as a~cho=~zed co ~o~a=d these ~d~Bs a~d =eco~e~d~c~o~s co the ~ve=s~de
<br /> Count? Soa=d o~ Supe~so=s ~o= Che~= consideration.
<br />
<br />BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS AND ZONING ADJUSTMENT
<br />
<br /> ZONING CASE V-81-834 - C. J. TABER - 1939 ARROYO DRIVE
<br />A communication was presented from the Board of Administrative Appeals and Zoning
<br />=Adjustment advising than, on January 9, 1984, the Board, by a vote of 6 ayes to 0 noes,
<br />~approved subject to conditions the request of C. J. Taber, Zoning Case V~81-834, for a
<br />~variance to construct a single-family residence and attached garage on an approximately,
<br />:l.25-acre vacant hillside lot of substandard width and area, and which will maintain a
<br />~side yard setback of 20 feet where 25 feet is required, located at 1939 Arroyo Drive,
<br />:situated on the northerly side of Arroyo Drive adjacent to the Victoria Country Club
<br />:Golf Course, in the 1900 block of Arroyo Drive, in Zone RC. It was determined that
<br />~the City Council would not set the matter for public hearing.
<br />
<br />ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION
<br />
<br />~CASE EPC-22-834 (REVISED) - PROPOSED GRADING PLAN - TENTATIVE TRACTS 18376-1
<br />~18376-2 - ALESSANDRO NORTHWESTERLY OF CITY LIMITS
<br />~A communication was presented from the Environmental Protection Commission advising
<br />~that, on January 11, 1984, the Commission, by a vote of 6 ayes to 2 noes and 1 absten-
<br />,=ion, determined that the proposed grading plan for Lots 17 through 20 of Tentative
<br />:Tract Map 18376-1 and Lots 1, Z, 7, 9, 11, 12, 17 and 18 of Tentative Tract Map
<br />I
<br />s18376-2, located on the southwest side of Alessandro Boulevard northwesterly of the
<br />iCiCy limits, in Zone RC, would not have a significant adverse environmental effect,
<br />~subjecc co cercain mitigating measures, Case EPC-22-834 (Revised). The Co~ission's
<br />[finding was upheld by the City Council.
<br />
<br /> CASE EPC-23-834 - PROPOSED GRADING PLAN - 1939 ARROYO DRIVE
<br />~A communication was presented from the Environmental Protection Commission advising
<br />:that, on January 11, 1984, the Commission, by a vote of 7 ayes to 1 no and 1 absten-
<br />ltion, determined that the proposed grading plan for a single-family residence at
<br />{1939 Arroyo Drive in Zone RC, would not have a significant adverse environmental
<br />~effect, subject co certain mitigating measures, Case EPC-23-834. The Commission's
<br />lfinding was upheld by the City Council.
<br />
<br />{CASE EPC-25-834 - PROPOSED SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - VICTORIA BET. CRIDGE AND UNIVERSITY
<br />~A communication was presented from the Environmental Protection Commission advising
<br />lthat, on January i1, 1984, the Commission, by a vote of 8 ayes to 0 noes, determined
<br />lthat the proposal by the City of Riverside to use Federal Community Development Block
<br />~Grant monies for sidewalk improvements along the easterly side of Victoria Avenue
<br />
<br />60-310
<br />
<br />
<br />
|