01-24-1984 CC MINUTES (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CITY OF RIVERSIDE COUNCILM E N '~,,o',~, ,, ~ ,,o,, ',~,, ', ,, ~ '~ ', ', ...................................................... ~eeee~. ~ _~29~ ............................. ~_D_~ _. j:?:~ : :four dwellin~ units per acre) an the approximately 11.8 vacant acres of land situated :at the westerly corner of Indiana and La Sierra Avenues and placin~ the property in :the Retail Business and Office land use designation or other land use designonions :deemed more appropriate by the City Council, Case G~-7-83~; and (2) place the above- :described property in Zone C-3 and remove the same from Zone R-1-65; with the City :Council uo also consider supplementin~ the requested zonin~ with Zones S and X, Zanin~ :Case R-17-83~. Also, further hearin~ was called on the appeal of Larry A. Ray, :Nau~les, Inc., of the decision of the EnvironmenEal Protection Commission that an :Environmental impact Report is required for proposals (1) and (2) above. The hearin~ :on the appeal of the environmental findings had been continued from December 13, 1983, :when the City Council requested the Plannin~ Department to advertise the necessary :notice of intention to adopt a negative declaration for Cases GP-7-83~ and R-17-834, ~and was a~ain continued from January 10, 198~, to permit the joint bearings. As :heretofore directed by the City Council, the minutes of the City Plannin~ Commission :and the Environmental Proteczion Commission pertainin~ to these cases are on file and :are a part of the evidence submitted at this hearing, whether or not an~ portion :thereof is read or discussed. The communication from the City Plannin~ Commission :stated that the Commission, by a vote of 8 ayes to 0 noes, approved the Retail Business :and Office land use designation and Zone C-2, the rezonin~ bein~ subject to the follow- :in~ conditions: (1) There shall be a Uwo-~ear time limit in which ~o satisfy the !followin~ conditions and finalize this action. If the zonin~ is not adopted within :two years af the dare of inuroduction of the ordinance, the action taken on this :petition shall be void. A time extension of not more than one year may be requested ~of the City Council by letter. Such time extension request must be received by =he ~Cit~ Clerk 30 days prior to the end of the two-year limit; (2) All utilities shall be satisfactorily relocated, protected and/or replaced to the specifications of the affected departments and a~encies, and easements for such facilities retained as necessary; (3) The Legal Department shall be requested to prepare, within 30 days of the date of approval of this case, the necessaz7 resolution for Ci=7 Council adoption of the subject General Plan amendmen=~ (~) Deed for widenin~ lndiana Avenue to ~ feet from monument centerline to Public Works Depar=menE specifications; (5) Installation of curb and ~ut=er at 32 feet from monument centerline, sidewalk and matchin~ pavement on Indiana Avenue to Public Works Department specifications; (6) Installation af a Class I1 bikeway on La Sierra Avenue to Public ~orks Department specifications; (7) Storm drain construction will be contingent on en~ineer~s drainage study~ (8) Deed for widenin~ La Sierra Avenue to 55 feet where needed from monument centerline to Pub- lic Works Department specifications~ (9) Installation of curb and ~utter at ~3 feet from monument centerline, sidewalk and matchin~ pavement on La Sierra Avenue to Public :Norks Department specifications~ (10) All property subjecz to floodin~ from 100-year :storm shall be placed in Zone WC prior to or concurrentiV with the final adoption of :this zonin~ case; (11) 0ff-si~e improvement plans to be approved by Public Works De- :partmerit and a surety posted to ~uarantee the required off-site improvements prior to :the final adoption of this zonin~ case; (12) Removal and/or relocation of irri~ation :facilities~ (13) Removal and/or relocation of trees as required~ (1~) Cash payment for :one-third the cost of zhe future median construction in La Sierra Avenue =o Public :~orks Departmen~ specificanions~ (15) Developer is responsible no have a traffic ~ener- :a~i0n s~ud~ prepared and appr0ved bV ~he Public Works Depot=men= prior ~o ~he [inal |adoption of ~his zonin~ case ~o determine if u=affic signal facilizies are warranted au :Indiana Avenue and Ls Sierra Avenue. ~£ ei~nale are war=anted, 8evelo~er ~ill be ~e- ~nsible to insnall the traffic signal facilities to Public Works Depar:ment specif~- ~ Ions. If traffic ~eneration stud7 does not warran~ insnallation of signals at this itime, Zhe developer is responsible for a cash pa3nnent of one-fifth the cost af the ru- pture signal; (16) Installation of a e-foot-high chain link fence or block wall 81an~ :the AT&SF railroad ri~ht-of-~ay; (17) Installation of sewers uo serve this project to :Public Works Department Specifications; and (18) Size, number and location of driveways :to Public Works Department specifications. The Plannin~ Director presented departmen- :tal recommendations, ~o~ether with. maps of the area, and reviewed the actions taken to idate. No one was present wishin~ to speak on the matter. No written protests were :presented. The hearin~ was officially closed. The appeal was ~ranted, and it was de- :termined that the General Plan amendment and =he rezonin~ would nat have a significant :adverse environmental effec~ and the staff report and the environmental assessment :were adopted as findings. The proposed General Plan amendment was approved as recom- :mended by the CitN Plannin~ Commission~ and the Ci=7 Attorney was requested to prepare Motion ,X, :the appropriate resolution for adoption. Further, Zone C-2 was approved, subject to Second , 'X, 'the recommended conditions; and the ordinance was introduced. All Ayes 69-293