Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF RIVERSIDE <br /> <br /> COUNCILMEMBERS <br /> <br /> ',~,',~,,,,,,,,,~,,, <br />_ January 8, 1985 WARDS <br /> <br /> :si~nificant adverse environmental effect, and the project will not significantly <br /> :affect the human environment subject to the follo~rlnE ~ici8ation }teasurea: (1) plot <br /> :plan review and approval by the City Plannit8 Commission under a revised conditional <br /> =use permit includinS the Srantin8 of a variance for any portion of the proposed <br /> :eiSht-foot-hi~h perimeter wall which encroaches into the required 'setback prior to <br /> :issuance of buildins permits; and (2) review and approval of the structural elevations <br /> ~by the Design Review Board and Park and Recreation Commission prior to issuance of <br /> }buildin~ permit, Case EPC-25-8~5. The Commission's findinE was upheld by the City <br /> ZCouncil. <br /> <br /> {CASE EPC-26-8~5 - PROPOSED GRADING PLAN- 2151SKYE DRIVE (LOT 5, TRACT 7757-1) <br /> :A co~unication was presented from the Environmental Protection Commission advisin~ <br /> }that, on December 12, 1984, the Cou~nission, by a vote of 7 ayes to 0 noes, determined <br /> ~that the proposed EradinS plan for a sinSIs-family residence at 2151Skye Drive <br /> ~(Lot 5, Tract 7757-1) would not have a significant adverse environmental effect, <br /> |subject to certain mitiSatin8 measures, Case EPC-26-845. The Commission's findin~ <br /> ]was upheld by the City Council. <br /> $ <br /> <br /> ~CASE EPC-27-8~5 - PROPOSED GRADING PLAN - 6900 JURUPA AVENUE <br /> :A communication was presented from the Environmental Protection Commission advisin8 <br /> Zthat, on December 12, 198~, the Commission, by a vote of~7 ayes to 0 noes, determined <br /> :that the proposed Zradin8 plan to provide a railroad spur at the gall Street Journal <br /> ~Plant located at 6900 Jurupa Avenue, situated on the south side of 3urupa Avenue <br /> seasterly of ~ilderness Avenue, would not have a sirnificant adverse environmental <br /> ~effect subject to certain mitiSatinE measures, Case EPC-27-845. The Commission's <br /> !findinS was upheld by the City Council. <br /> :CASE EPC-28-845 - PROPOSED I~PROVEMENTS TO ELEVENTH BETWEEN KANSAS AND DOUGLASS <br /> iA coummnication was presented from the Environmental Protection Conmission advisin8 <br /> :that, on December 12, 1984, the Commission, by a vote of 7 ayes to 0 noes, determined .... <br /> }that the proposed improvements to Eleventh Street between Kansas and Douglass Avenues, <br /> Zincludin8 curbs, ~utters and minor pavement wideninS, would not have a significant <br /> :adverse environmental effect, Case EPC-28-8~5. The Commission's findin~ was upheld <br /> Zby the City Council. <br /> <br /> ~CASE EPC-29-8~5 - PROPOSED IHPROVE~ENTS TO THIRTEENTH AT PARK <br /> ~A communication was presented from the Environmental Protection Commission advisin8 <br /> :that, on December 12, 1984, the Commission, by a vote of 7 ayes to 0 noes, determined <br /> :that the proposed improvements to Thirteenth Street at Park Avenue, includin8 curb, <br /> ~utter and minor pavement wideninS, would not have a siSntficant adverse environmental <br /> effect, Case EPC-29-8~5. The Commission~s findinS was upheld by the City Council. <br /> <br /> :PURCHASING SERVICES MANAGER <br /> <br /> IBID NO. 3756 - NEBRASKA AVENUE STOR~ DRAZN (A HI/D-FUNDED PROJECT) <br /> n consideration of the recommendation from the Purchasin8 Services Hana~er and the <br /> |Public ~orks Department, the bid of Riverside Construction Company, in the amount of <br /> ]$21,823.00, was accepted for furnishins all labor, materials and equipment for con- <br /> :structin8 Nebraska Avenue storm drain (a HI/D-funded project). All other bids were <br /> |rejected, and the bonds submitted with said rejected bids were released from further <br /> |liability; the City Attorney was requested to prepare the necessary contract; and <br /> |execution of the contract was authorized and directed upon a~proval b~ the City <br /> ~Attorney of the required performance bonds. <br /> <br /> :BID NO. 3757 - GREENLEAF DR. STOPa~ DRAIN AND ~TILLARD ~AY AT HILLSIDE DR. CATCH BASINS <br /> ~ln consideration of the recommendation from the Purchasin8 Services Nana8er and the <br /> :Public ~orks Department, the bid of Kershaw Construction Company, in the amount of <br /> :$&0,632.00, was accepted for furnishin~ all labor, materials and equipment for con- <br /> :structin~ the Greenleaf Drive storm drain and ~illard gay at Hillside Drive catch <br /> :basins. All other bids were rejected, and the bonds submitted with said rejected <br /> :bids were released from further liability; the City Attorney was requested to prepare <br /> :the necessary contract; and execution of the contract was authorized and directed <br /> :upon approval by the City Attorney of the required performance bonds. <br /> <br />70-288 <br /> <br /> <br />