CI1Y OF I~IVERSIDE
<br />
<br /> COUNCILMEMBERS
<br />
<br />Roll Call: Present :x:x:x:xix{xix:
<br />The Invocation was given by the Reverend William Davis, First Congregational Church.
<br />The Pledge of Allegiance was given to the Flag.
<br />
<br />MINUTES
<br />The Minutes of the Meeting of March 15, 1988, were approved as submitted. Motion ,X,
<br /> Second ~X~
<br /> Ayes ~X: :X:X:X:X:X
<br /> Not Voting
<br />
<br />PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AT 3 P.M.
<br />
<br />ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
<br />ELECTRICAL FACILITIES IN ORANgECREST ANNEXATION NO. 57 - RESOLUTION
<br />3 P.M.--Hearing was called to consider acquisition of Southern California Edison Company
<br />electrical facilities in the Orangecrest Annexation No. 57, and to adopt a Resolution of
<br />Necessity pursuant to the Eminent Domain Law of the State of California, being Title 7
<br />of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure commencin~ ~rlth Section 1230.010 thereof. A
<br />written report was presented from the City Manager and the Public Utilities Director,
<br />concurred in by the City Attorney, recommending that the City Council (1) adopt a Resolu-
<br />tion of Necessity; and (2) authorize the City Attorney to commence eminent domain pro-
<br />ceedings to acquire the subject electrical distribution facilities. No one was present
<br />wishing to speak on the matter. No written protests were presented. The hearing was of-
<br />ficially closed; the reco~nendattons were approved as presented; and Resolution
<br />No. 16767 of the City Council of the City of Riverside, California, Stating the Public
<br />Use for Which Certain Southern California Edison Company Electrical Distribution Facili-
<br />ties, Including Interests in Real Property, in the Area Known as "Annexation No. 57--
<br />Orangecrest" and Annexed to the City of Riverside in the Proceedings Designated as "LAF-
<br />CO No. 85-68-5, Annexation No. 57 to the City of Riverside" is Sought to be Acquired and
<br />Statin~ the Statutory Authority Authorizin~ Such Acquisition by Eminent Domain; Describ-
<br />ing the General Location and Extent of the Property to be A~quired; Finding and Determin-
<br />!n~ the. Public Interest and Necessity Require the Acquisition of Said Facilities, That
<br />the Project is Planned or Located in a Manner That Will be Mast Compatible With the
<br />Greatest Public Good and the Least Private Injury, That the Property Herein Described is
<br />Necessary for the Proposed Project, and That the Offer Required by Section 7267.2 of the
<br />Government Code Has Been Made to the Owner of Record of the Subject Froperry; and Author- Motion X~
<br />izing Proceedings in Eminent Domain, was presented; and the title having been read, and Second
<br />further readin~ waived by the unanimous consent of Councilmembers present, was adopted. All Ayes
<br />
<br />ZONING CASE C-11-678 (REVISED) - 8171 MAGNOLIA -APPEAL - CONTINUED
<br />3 P.M.--aearinS was called on the appeal of Vernon R. Will, Extended Care Enterprises,
<br />Inc., from the decision of the City Plannin8 Commission in denying their request for a, '
<br />revised conditional use permit to add 20 beds to an established 99-bed convalescent hos-:
<br />pital and to provid~ additional area for dining, physical therapy, lobby, etc., located:
<br />at 8171 Magnolia Avenue, situated on the northwesterly side of Magnolia Avenue north-:
<br />easterly of Adsms Street, in Zone R-1-65, Zoning Case C-11-678 (Revised). A co~munica~
<br />tion was presented from the appellant requesting a two-week continuance of this hearing:
<br />to allow additional time for the Planning Department to review proposed changes to the~ Motion X
<br />plans for the property and submit their report. Accordingly, the public hearing was: Second
<br />continued to April 5, 1988, at 1:30 p.m. : All Ayes
<br />
<br />FURTHER HEARING - ZONING CASE V-108-878 - 4980 LA SIERRA - APPEAL GEANTE~ - RESOLUTION '
<br />3 P.M.--Further hearing was called on the appeal of Ray Richardson, Ray Richardson Auto:
<br />Sales, relative to the decision of the Board of Administrative Appeals and Zoning Adjust-,
<br />merit in granting in part his request for the follo~rlng variance to legalize the existing,
<br />setback of a used car sales facility at 4980 La Sierra Avenue, situated on the southwest
<br />side of La Sierra Avenue southeasterly of Doverwood Drive, in Zone C-3: to delete the,
<br />required ten-foot landscaped setback along La Sierra Avenue, Zoning Case V-108-878. The,
<br />hearing had been continued from February 23, 1988, for publication of the necessary no-,
<br />rice of negative declaration. Following a brief discussion, the hearing was officially,
<br />closed. The City Council granted the appeal and waived the requirement for a landscaped~
<br />setback and approved the retention of the existing post and chain link fence in its,
<br />present location, subject to the remaining conditions listed in full in the communica-;
<br />tion from the Board of Administrative Appeals and Zoning Adjustment. It was determined ,
<br />
<br />73-391
<br />
<br />
<br />
|