Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF RIVERSIDE <br /> <br /> COUNCI LMEMBERS <br /> <br />Ds~e oE Hee~tng: ~eb~a~ 9, 1988 <br />Time of Mee~ing: 9 A.H. <br />~ace o~ ~e~n~Lj~~_~.y~y.~~ .............................................. <br /> <br />Roll Call: Presen~ X X X X X, X, X, <br />The In~ca~ion ~s given by ~he Reverend Charles Mitchell, Seventh Day Advencis~ Church. <br />The Pledge of Mlegiance was ~iven ~o uhe Flag. <br /> <br />The Minu~es of the Meeting of Februa~ 2, 1988, were approved as su~iC~ed. Motion :X', <br /> Second ~ X', <br /> All Ayes <br /> <br />The City Manger introduced Barbara S~eckel, [be Ci~y's new Fi~nce Director. <br /> <br />P~SE~ATION <br />Mr. Jose Pe~, ~ecu~ive Director of ~he United Way of Inland Counties, ~hanked ~he City <br />Council and City sployees for ~heir ~enerous givin~ ~o ~he Unit~ Way c~pai~ <br />1987. He [hen pressriled indi~d~l cer~iEicaces ~o each United Way depar~men~ represen- <br />tative, a~ presented a special Plaque o~ Appreciation ~o Javier Rosalee ~or his assis- <br />tance in las~ year's c~pai~. <br /> <br />The Chair recogniz~ the presence in ~he audience o~ Richard Caches representing the <br />Magnolia Cen~er ~sber of Cserce, Eric Pe~rek representing ~he Hun~er Park-Nor~hside <br />C~ber of Co~erce and Richard Gaines represen~in~ uhe Universi~y-Canyon Cres~ Chsber <br />o~ Cserce. <br /> <br />CONSE~ C~ <br />The follo~ng i~ss were approved by one so[ion a~fiming ~he actions appropria~e <br />those i~s lie~ed on ~he Consen~ Calendar and as su~ed ~o the City Council for con- <br />sideration; ~h ~he excep~i~ o~ ~he reports concerning City and School Dis~ric~ in~e~ <br />agency cooperaUi~ activities and Trac~ 21767 and ~he ordi~nce regarding ~ou~y euop Motion ~X~ <br />conurol a~ ~ler S~ree~ and Cook Avenue, all of which were r~oved ~o the Discussion Cal- Second ~X~ <br />endar. All Ayes <br /> <br />CI~ ~INC CO~ISSION <br /> <br />ZO~NC ~SE C-3~867 (~S~) - C. ~ P. ~ONOE - 1016~ <br />A cmunica~ion was presented ~r~ ~he City Planning Cmission advising ~ha~, on Janu- <br />ary 21, 1988, ~he Cmissi~ considered ~he req~s~ o~ C. and P. Leonor, Zoning ~se <br />C-3~867 (Revised), ~or a revised conditional use pemi~ uo amend ~be approved plo~ plan <br />for a proposed ~rsing h~e ~ deleting a required ull a~ 101~ C~ress Avenue, si~ua~- <br />ed on the northerly side of C~ress Aven~ ~sterly o~ Cres~ Avers, in Zone ~; and, <br />a vo~e o~ 8 aFes co 0 n~s, approved subJec~ ~o condigits a tuber ~e redwo~ or cedar <br />fence six fee~ high in lieu of ~he required mason~ wall ~o screen the parking loc and <br />drive~y ~r~ ~he adjacent proper~y ~o ~he eas~. The City Council upheld ~he C~is- <br />sion's recomenda~ion; and de~emined ~M~ ~he ma~er would no~ be se~ for public hear- <br />ing. <br /> <br />~E NC-2-878 - ~ETION OF EI~ ~ ~O~D~ <br />A csnicaci~ was presented ~r~ ~he City Planning Csission advising chat, on Janu- <br />a~ 21, 1988, ~he C~iasiou, by a vo~e of 9 aFes ~o 0 n~s, approved subJec~ Co condi- <br />tions ~he req~s~ for a s~ree~ ~e change for a portion of Rivers Stree~ situated <br />~he north side of Colabin Avenue ~o Cloverdale Street, Case NC-2-878. The Public Works <br />Depar~sn~ was req~s~ed ~o ~umish ~he necessary legal descrip~ion req~red in connec- <br />tion wi~h ~he proposed s~ree~ nse cMnge, and ~he Legal Departmen[ ~s authorized <br />prepare the appropriate resolu~i~ for adop~ion. <br /> <br />E~EO~AL ~O~CION CO~ISSION <br /> <br />~SE EPC-32-878 - ~O~S~ ~INC ~N - SO~S~LY OF BOX 8~INCS AT ~ <br />A comunica~ion ~s presented ~r~ ~he Enviromen~al ProJection Cmission advisin~ <br />chat, on Jan~ 13, 1988, ~he Cmission, by a vo~e of 6 ayes ~o 2 noes and 1 absten- <br />tion, de~emined ~hat ~he proposed ~radinE plan ~or Zoning Case ~-2-867 and Trac~ <br />22872, a 16~unl~ planned residen~ial developend, situated on approximately 2~ acres <br />land located sou~h~e~erly o~ Box Springs Boulevard a~ E1 Cerrico Drive, could ha~ a <br />si~i~ican~ e~ec~ ~ ~he environend, bu~ ~11 no~ in this case i~ certain mitigating <br />measures are required as conditions o~ approval, Case EPC-32-878. The Cmission's <br />finding was upheld by the City Council. <br /> <br />73-322 <br /> <br /> <br />