O-2893 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

10 11 1§ 17 18 19 2O 2§ 27 28 29 ~0 ~2 TERRITORY, DESIGNATED ~IVE~SIDE ANNg~A~ION"N6~ 12 (LA ~OL~NA ANNeXATiON NO. 1)", TO ~HR CiTY Or RIVERSIDE. The C{ty ¢ouneii of {he Gity 6£ RigerSide does as foiioWs~ . WH~R~AS~ on the 16th day o£ A~gust, i96~, the Otb Council of the City of Riverside did pass and adopt Resol~ttOh No. 8953~ giving hoti~e oF the ppoposal to anneX Certaih ~n- i~habibed ~e~ito~y to the City oF RiVehside, said being therein desighaFed as "Riverside Annexation No, 12 (La Coii~a A~nexatio~ No. 1)", said Resolution describing the both~da~ies O£ the ter~ito~y p~oposed to be annexed; and, W~EREAs, said ResolUtiOn No, 8953 did contain a notice oF ~he daY~ ho~r ~d place when ~d where the Ciby Co~ncii of the Ciby Of RiVerside woUld hear probesbs made by any person owning real ppope~ty within the be~iSory proposed ~o be annexed, the 2ime of said hearing being nob less bhan Forty nor more 5hah sixty days From bhe date of passage of said Resolution; and ~REAS, on the ~Tgh day of Sepbember~ i960~ ab the ho~ of 9:30 O'clock A,M, in the Co~cil Chambers in bhe City Hall oF bhe CtbY of Riverside, County oF Rive~side, SbaFe of CaliCoP~ia, ~aid bime and place being the day, hour and place Fixed in said ResolUtion No. 8953 for hearing protests ~o 5he said anneXabion~ the said City Co,cji.did hear and pass upon all proFesbs made ~o 5he proposed annexation ~d did determine 5hat probesbs had nob been made by bhe owners of one-halF oF the val~e of the p~iva~ely oecd beprt~ory proposed bo be annexed as sho~ by the last equalized assessmenb roll, no~ by public oF one-halF oF the val~e oF the publicly o~ed berriFo~y propOsed ~o be annexed as determined by said legislative body; ~d, -1-