Laserfiche WebLink
12 <br />RESowna No. h799 b" "MAR 281950 <br />RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL, OF TRE CITY.OF, RIVERSIDE} OALiW- 6, WA1IC <br />OIdA MAKING ITS FINDINGS ANT) bETERMINAITONS,WITH -REFRP+ Sp <br />Qrn e�.n wrirc nbinifA6 brlt..r�bribvv atlas �: nn lieMbnrc Nn :nc+ nti}urv�mm nV+IY� fIi y <br />OURBS AND GUTTERS AND'APPURTENANe1STRbf�Z?,o <br />BETWEEN SXWWICK AND EVCALYPTUS AVENUE; PURSUANT TO THA`_,A rJ <br />PROVISIONS CF THE "SPECIAL ASSESSMFUT:LNVE8TIOATIOW LIMITA <br />TION AND MAJORITYPROTESTACT OF 1951% BEINO DIVISION 4 O ± <br />THE STREETS AhD HIGHWAYSCODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. - <br />0 <br />(Eleventh St, between Sedgwiek h Bubalyptus Ade,.Distriet) CJ <br />WHEREAS, the Counoil of the City of Riversidey'0alifdrhia, <br />did on the 7th day of Febituary, 1950, pursuant to statute, approvi�, <br />,, <br />the written report prepared and filed by the City Ethgineer:of =i <br />said City in accordance with the provisions of the "Special Assesti <br />mont Investigation,'Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1901" <br />and did on said day fix Tuesday, the 28th day of March, 1950, at <br />the hour of ten (10=00) oIclock Ailt.. as the day'yand hour and the <br />Council Chamber in the City HallInsaid City of Rivereide� as the <br />place of hearing upon said report; and, - <br />WHLTtEAS, the City Clerk of said CityofRiverside did deposit <br />In the United States Mails, with postage prepaid, a notice of the <br />time and place of hearing upon said report,all in the time, manner <br />and form requiredbysaid Code;' <br />NOMI, THUBTORE, be it resolved that; the Council of the City <br />of Riverside hereby finds and determines as follower <br />(1) Thatprotests in writing have not been filed by the <br />owners (as defined by Section 5021 in the Improvement Act of 1911, <br />being Division 7 of the Streets and Iiighways Code of the State of <br />California) of the majority of the area of the lands to be assessed <br />within the proposed assessment district, as said district is defined <br />in said written report. <br />(2) That the aggregate special assessment levied on the lands <br />proposed to be assessed for such -improvement; as such liability is <br />shown in said preliminary written report, will not exoeedfifty per <br />oent (50%) of the true value of all lands to be so asseased,as said <br />hsb -1- <br />