Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br /> 9 <br /> <br /> 10 <br /> <br /> 11 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br /> iY <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br /> 20 <br /> <br /> 21 <br /> <br /> 22 <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />2~ <br /> <br />26 <br /> <br />27 <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />~0 <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO. llSO7 <br /> <br />A HESOLUT!ON Ol.' THE CITY COUHCIL 0F THE CITY OF <br /> <br /> WIIEHEAS Section <br /> <br />State of California, <br />for tile construction <br />urban areas ~.;hich qualify as extension <br />llighways; and <br /> <br /> W}iE}{EAS the Federal Government, <br /> <br /> 143.3 of the Streets and l{lghways Code, <br />authorizes the expenditure of State funds <br />of City streets or County roads within <br /> <br /> of Federa]-Ald Secondary <br /> <br /> in ~ecognizin[~ the need <br /> <br />for this program, subvenes approximately $30 million each year <br />to the State for expenditures on the urban extensions of <br /> <br />complete these projects <br /> <br />within their jurisdiction without this <br /> <br />Commission wi].] soon consider <br />Extension Program at the <br />and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS diversion <br /> <br />than 3/4 of lg of the State's highway <br />curtail major improvement projects at <br /> <br /> eliminating the Federal-Aid Urban <br />conclusion of the 1972-73 fiscal year; <br /> <br />of these funds, which represent less <br /> budget, will seriously <br /> the local level where <br /> <br /> <br />