Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> , <br /> cc: Mayor / <br /> City Council J <br /> City Manager / <br /> City Attom5Y / <br /> Nancy H Taylor Pl~nning. / <br /> Public Works ..; <br /> 5042 Woodman Avenue <br /> Riverside, CA 92506 Ht::L;EIVED <br /> 951-686-8471 <br /> MAR 2 6 2007 <br /> March 19,2007 City of Riverside <br /> City Clerk's Office <br /> Honorable Mayor and esteemed Council, <br /> Usually when a governmental decision is made to limit something, this action is believed <br /> to be a solution to a problem. I am unclear about the problem the action of limiting the <br /> number of animals an owner can have in the City of Riverside is intending to solve. In <br /> addition, I wonder what resources will be required to enforce this limit and will the <br /> solution effectively solve the problem and be cost effective? Lastly, I wonder what <br /> "new" problems this "solution" will create. <br /> Is the problem overpopulation? If this is the case, it seems to me the solution would be <br /> mandatory spay and neutering, except for legitimate breeders. <br /> Is the problem cruelty? Animal cruelty is about the owner, not about the number of <br /> animals. <br /> Is the problem safety? There is no correlation between this issue and the limit. I can <br /> have one nasty Pit Bull or a perfect little poodle that bites someone and still be "legal". <br /> Is the problem noise? How much noise do 4 barking dogs make compared to 1 0 non- <br /> barking dogs? The issue is barking period... not the noise level or number. <br /> As I look at the County of Riverside including unincorporated areas, residents are limited <br /> to 4 dogs and 9 cats before a kennel license is required. What direct bearing has this limit <br /> had on the quality of life and the safety of the population of the unincorporated areas of <br /> the County? I also wonder how has this limit impacted the City/County Animal Shelter? <br /> Recent stats indicate 80% of the Shelter's population comes from the unincorporated area <br /> where these limits are in force. If it is discovered that a family has exceeded their limit of <br /> animals, they have several choices: if! am responsible, I would find a home for all the <br /> animals I have over the limit. If I am not a responsible person, I would set the animals <br /> free or take them to the shelter to be euthanized. <br /> It seems to me the issue to correct any problem regarding animals is not the number, but <br /> the accountability of the owner to manage their animals responsibly and/or the capacity <br /> of each animal to reproduce. Limiting the number of animals I can have will not make <br /> me more responsible nor will it encourage me to have my pets spayed or neutered. <br />