Laserfiche WebLink
WATER 1 ENERGY I LIFE <br />PUBLIC UTILITIES <br />RIVERSIDE PUBLIC UTILITIES <br />Board Memorandum <br />BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES <br />DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2023 <br />SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF THE GARFIELD AVENUE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT <br />PROJECT — WORK ORDER NO. 2402650 IN THE AMOUNT OF $650,000 <br />ISSUE: <br />Consider approval of Work Order No. 2402650 in the total amount of $650,000 for all engineering, <br />construction, paving and construction contingency costs for the Garfield Avenue Water Main <br />Replacement Project. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />That the Board of Public Utilities approve Work Order No. 2402650 in the total amount of $650,000 <br />for all engineering, construction, paving and construction contingency costs for the Garfield <br />Avenue Water Main Replacement Project. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />The Water Division received notice that a portion of its water pipeline along Garfield Avenue in <br />the Highgrove Community encroaches onto private property. The pipeline in question is an 8 - <br />inch cast iron water pipeline built in 1957, which Riverside Public Utilities (RPU) acquired from <br />the East Riverside Water Company in 1959. The property where the water pipeline encroaches <br />is being developed for residential housing by a developer and will receive water service from the <br />Riverside Highland Water Company (RHWC). The developer for the housing project requested <br />that RPU's water pipeline be relocated to within the public street right-of-way as soon as possible, <br />as its current location interferes with the developer's ability to construct their required <br />improvements. RPU surveyed the property and confirmed that the pipeline was on private <br />property. This pipeline portion serves one RPU customer, the Highgrove elementary school. To <br />not delay the developer and be liable for damages to the developer, RPU must expedite the <br />relocation of the water pipeline. <br />Staff evaluated several options to expedite the work, such as transferring the service to RHWC, <br />paying the developer to conduct the job, and having RPU complete the work. Moving the water <br />service to RHWC is comparable to RPU's costs to relocate the pipeline but would need approval <br />by the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission, which is a lengthy process and <br />would delay the project. The second option is for the developer to perform the work. Although <br />the costs for the developer to perform the work are unknown, they are expected to come at a <br />premium given the urgency to complete the job and would require RPU Board and Council <br />approval. The most economical and expeditious solution is for RPU field forces to relocate the <br />pipeline. <br />The developer understands the steps and time for RPU to receive approval for this type of work <br />but has informed RPU of potential delay claims if RPU does not move the pipeline promptly. As <br />a result, the RPU General Manager authorized staff to commence efforts toward relocating the <br />