Laserfiche WebLink
OToolkit%2010-1-20.pdf ) It is referenced in Section VII below to check the rules for each form of local <br />government. <br />On behalf of the Brown and Black Redistricting Alliance, we want to ensure the city prioritizes the Voting Rights <br />Act and Fair Maps Act. According to the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), All <br />government entities must include required data, related to citizen voting age population (CVAP), and other <br />relevant information required by state and federal law as part of city's district maps, in order to consider that <br />data in preparing the draft maps. The Fair and Inclusive Redistricting for Municipalities and Political Subdivisions <br />Act (FAIR MAPS Act), requires the city to comply with the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), and, to the <br />extent practicable, keep communities of interest together. The new Riverside City redistricting maps should <br />not only contain total Census 2020 population data, population percentages and CVAP data included. <br />According to Census 2020, in the City of Riverside there are 314, 998 people who live in the City of <br />Riverside. There are 53.7 % of Hispanic/Latino, 6.2% African Americans, and 7% are Asian American Pacific <br />Islanders. Out of the Citizen voting age population, there are 241, 620 people, which are 50.60% <br />Hispanic/Latino, 6.32% African American and 7.99% are African American. We should have at least three to <br />four Latino Majority Wards out of the seven Riverside wards. We would like Racially polarized Voting Analysis <br />to be taken into consideration when redrawing the ward lines. Voting Rights Act (VRA) to provide a statutory <br />remedy for racial vote dilution. At the heart of vote dilution law is the concept of racially polarized voting. Voting <br />is polarized when (1) the political preferences of majority -race and minority -race voters diverge substantially <br />and the racial majority votes with enough cohesion to usually defeat the minority's candidates of choice. We <br />call these the "preference polarization" and "voting power" requirements. Since the Supreme Court's 1986 <br />decision in Thornburg v Gingles, plaintiffs have had to satisfy both conditions and propose a remedial district at <br />the outset of their case. Only if this threshold Gingles showing has been made does the court apply the liability <br />standard prescribed by statute: whether the "totality of circumstances" indicates that plaintiff -race voters "have <br />less opportunity than other members of the electorate to participate in the political process and to elect <br />representatives of their choice." <br />Community Engagement Plan feedback: <br />Thank you: <br />In looking at Riverside City Redistricting Timeline chart, Thank you for hosting A SERIES OF WORKSHOPS IN <br />EVERY WARD. <br />Additional Recommendations: <br />We need more than one public hearing prior to the drawing of map session and have multiple public hearings <br />throughout the city with options for evening and weekend for working people to attend. Plus add a Spanish <br />public hearing. The City of Victorville did it. <br />Thank you for your time, <br />Maribel Nunez, Co -Convener <br />Ana Gonzalez, Co -Convener <br />Brown and Black Redistricting Alliance <br />2 <br />