Laserfiche WebLink
BE-bwd AHL. ]SI AVE <br />Riverside city council: <br />Date: 10-12-21 <br />Item No. 18 <br />Re: Discussion Calendar <br />Agenda: #18 <br />Riverside County Redistricting Briefing presentation by Riverside County Executive Office - <br />Review 2022 Redistricting Plan <br />Dear Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and City Council: <br />My name is Maribel Nunez, Riverside City Ward 1 Resident and part of the Brown and Black <br />Redistricting Alliance. I am writing a letter for today's Riverside city council meeting 10/12/21 <br />Discussion Calendar Agenda #18. <br />1 have recommendations regarding the type of redistricting commission, type of process and <br />what should be the top redistricting criteria. <br />In the list below of the Riverside City Redistricting Staff report, where they reference 2012 <br />redistricting criteria, it doesn't prioritize the Voting Rights Act. <br />1. Equalize the population count in each Ward within 10% (top to bottom) <br />2. Achieve +5% from optimal population per Ward <br />3. Comply with all applicable laws <br />4. Avoid disqualification of City Councilmembers during a term <br />5. Maintain continuity of existing Wards, to the extent possible <br />6. Draw Wards that are compact and contiguous <br />7. Use natural, geographic boundaries to the extent possible <br />8. Maintain cohesive neighborhoods and community interests, to the extent possible <br />9. Consider school districts and avoid dividing same, to the extent possible <br />10. Maintain income diversity within Wards, to the extent possible <br />According to the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), All <br />government entities must include required data, related to citizen voting age population (CVAP), <br />and other relevant information required by state and federal law as part of city's district maps, in <br />order to consider that data in preparing the draft maps. The Fair and Inclusive Redistricting for <br />Municipalities and Political Subdivisions Act (FAIR MAPS Act), requires the city to comply with <br />the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), and, to the extent practicable, keep communities of <br />interest together. The FAIR MAPS Act also requires cities to include with each draft map <br />"information on the total population, citizenship voting age population, and racial and ethnic <br />characteristics of the citizenship voting age population of each proposed supervisorial district. If <br />city maps only include total population data and fail to disclose CVAP data for any of the <br />proposed districts, then the city fails to comply and can risk litigation. Without the CVAP data, <br />broken down by racial and ethnic demographics, the public cannot evaluate whether the <br />proposed maps comply with Section 2 of the VRA. Further, federal law is clear that in <br />