Laserfiche WebLink
City ofArts &Innovation <br />Inclusiveness, Community <br />Engagement, and Governmental <br />Processes Committee <br />1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111l IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111l IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111111111111111111111 <br />TO: INCLUSIVENESS, COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DATE: AUGUST 3, 2022 <br />AND GOVERNMENTAL PROCESSES COMMITTEE <br />FROM: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE WARDS: ALL <br />SUBJECT: FORMATION OF AD HOC COMMITTEE WITH BOARD OF ETHICS FOR REVIEW OF <br />RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.78 — CODE OF ETHICS AND CONDUCT <br />COMPLAINT HEARING PROCESS <br />ISSUE: <br />Appoint a member of the Inclusiveness, Community Engagement, and Governmental Processes <br />Committee to an ad hoc committee which will include Board of Ethics members to review the Riverside <br />Municipal Code Chapter 2.78 — Code of Ethics and Conduct (Code) complaint hearing process. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />That the Inclusiveness, Community Engagement, and Governmental Processes Committee (ICGC) <br />appoint a member of the Committee to an ad hoc committee comprised of Board of Ethics members to <br />review the Code of Ethics and Conduct complaint hearing process. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />From August 2020 through June 2022, a total of seven Code of Ethics and Conduct complaints were <br />filed with the City Clerk's Office. Six complaints were forwarded to Board of Ethics Hearing Panels for <br />pre -hearing conferences and one was dismissed based on the opinion of outside legal counsel. <br />In light of the Code of Ethics and Conduct complaint hearing process being applied and practiced as it <br />is currently written in the Code, it became evident to staff, the Board of Ethics, and the City Council that <br />an in-depth review of the process is necessary. <br />Riverside Municipal Code Section 2.78.110 (Oversight and Monitoring) requires an annual review of <br />the Code of Ethics and Conduct to determine its effectiveness. While the Board of Ethics had active <br />complaints pending, the ICGC refrained from making recommendations for revisions to the Code of <br />Ethics and Conduct until all the complaints were finalized and closed. <br />