Laserfiche WebLink
<br />RIVERSIDE PUBLIC UTILITIES <br /> Board Memorandum <br /> <br />BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES DATE: DECEMBER 13, 2021 <br />SUBJECT: THE GAGE CANAL COMPANY CAPITAL EXPENDITURE BUDGET FOR FY <br />2021/22 IN THE AMOUNT OF $241,830 WITH A CITY OF RIVERSIDE SHARE IN <br />THE AMOUNT OF $147,516.30 <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE: <br /> <br />Consider recommending that the City Council approve capital <br />expenditure budget for FY 2021/22, in the amount of $241,830 with a City of Riverside <br />proportional share in the amount of $147,516.30. <br /> <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />That the Board of Public Utilities recommend the <br />capital expenditure budget for FY 2021/22, in the amount of $241,830, with the City of Riverside <br />proportional share in the amount of $147,516.30. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND: <br /> <br />The Gage Canal Company (Company) was established in 1890 as a private, non-profit California <br />corporation. The purpose of the Company was to bring artesian and pumped well waters, <br />originating in the Bunker Hill basin area of San Bernardino, into Riverside for the purposes of <br />irrigation. Later, additional wells were drilled in the Riverside North and Riverside South basins <br />to increase their water supply. Shareholders in the Company had a right to a certain amount of <br />gravity-fed water from the canal delivered on certain days of the month. In 1959, the City of San <br />Bernardino and San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water sought to condemn the Gage Canal <br />Company in order to reduce the amount of water being exported out of the Bunker Hill <br />groundwater basin. At the behest of some of the Gage shareholders, the City of Riverside (City) <br />exercised its power of eminent domain by filing a lawsuit to acquire all assets of the Company in <br />1959 to secure water rights for the beneficial use of the residents of the City. <br />On June 9, 1965, the City and the Company entered into a stipulated judgment (Stipulation for <br />Judgement in Eminent Domain and Final Order of Condemnation, Case No. 70785), under which <br />judgment was the City agreed to continue irrigation water delivery to the shareholders and to <br />employ the Company for the operation of the canal. In effect, the City purchased all the water <br />rights, facilities, and property of the Gage Canal Company, less three operating properties <br />retained by the Company. <br /> <br />