Laserfiche WebLink
REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON BOARDS AND C014MISSIONS OTHER THAN PUBLIC <br />UTILITIES. <br />Attached herewith is Article VII, Appointive Boards <br />and Commissions, as revised by Mr. Harry C. Williams following <br />our conference with him Thursday evening, April 10. We had <br />previously met and studied and discussed his first draft of <br />Article VII of which he had furnished us with five copies. <br />Sections 706 and 707. There is no provision for a <br />Planning Commission in the present charter but we feel that <br />there should be, and therefore have included it in this Article. <br />It was agreed at our first committee meeting that decisions by <br />the Planning Commission, following hearings held before it, <br />should be final, except that within ten days a petition could <br />be presented to the City Council requesting a hearing before the <br />Council, and that the City Council could grant or deny such a <br />request. This would do away with the present ordinance provision <br />which makes hearings before the City Council compulsory. However, <br />Mr. Williams feels that this should be governed by ordinance <br />rather than by Charter provision. It is therefore not included <br />in these sections. <br />Sections 708 and 709, Personnel Board, we did not <br />consider, since there is a separate committee on Personnel. <br />Section 710. The Board of Library Trustees is the only <br />appointive board to be administrative, but Mr. Williams pointed <br />out that its functions are entirely different than those of any <br />other board and it should be administrative rather than advisory. <br />The provisions of this section seem to conform to most of the <br />recommendations made by our present librarian, Mr. Lake, and to <br />charter provisions of other cities. <br />Mr. Lake has suggested that a provision be made similar <br />to the first paragraph of Section 711, whereby certain agencies, <br />such as the county, might be accorded temporary membership on the <br />commission. He also suggests that the board be given greater <br />power of expenditure. They now spend as they see fit,income not <br />budgeted for, such as income from the schools or the county, not <br />foreseen at budget time. <br />Mr. Lake's first suggestion could be complied with <br />easily, but in regard to his suggestion in the matter of expendi- <br />tures Mr. Williams points out that the board of library trustees <br />is not accountable to the people, but to the City Council, and <br />that the City Council should have the power to approve expenditures. <br />Section 711. The present Riverside city charter provides <br />for a Board of Park Commissioners. A recreation committee, <br />advisory to the park board has been created by ordinance, and th&re <br />is in addition a council committee called the recreation and educa- <br />tion committee. In that the parks department and the recreation <br />department must work together, since there is an overlapping of <br />their interests, it is usual for city charters to provide for a <br />joint commission. <br />It has been suggested that this be designated a Parks <br />and Recreation Commission, rather than Recreation and Parks, and <br />that there be a provision for street trees. Mr. Williams concurs <br />with both suggestions and would give the commission control and <br />jurisdiction over parkways and street trees. <br />- 1 - <br />