Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r1 <br /> <br />CITY OF RIVERSIDE <br /> <br />Meeting Date: 4/23/2002 <br />Item No.: 2 <br /> <br />INTEROFFICE MEMO <br /> <br />"People Serving <br />People" <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Massage Appeal Committee <br /> <br />DATE: April 18,2002 <br /> <br />FROM: GregoryP. Priamos <br />Interim City Attorney <br /> <br />SUBJECT: MASSAGE APPEAL HEARING FORMAT <br /> <br />The following format should be followed during the massage appeal hearing of Kathy Perez <br />scheduled for April 23, 2002: <br /> <br />1. Chair of the Committee or the Clerk identifies the appeal. <br /> <br />2. Representative from the Riverside Police Department ("RPD") provides the Committee <br />with an initial report and summary of the facts giving rise to the denial of the permit by <br />the Chief of Police. <br /> <br />3. Appellant is called upon to submit evidence as to why the certificate of registration should <br />be issued, that is, evidence demonstrating that the appellant has furnished, as required <br />under RMC section 5.52.050. I, either: <br /> <br />"(1) a diploma or certificate of graduation from a recognized school wherein the <br />theory, method, profession and work of massage is taught, as approved by the <br />California State Department of Education, together with a certified transcript of <br />the applicant's school records showing completion of a course of at least five <br />hundred hours or <br /> <br />(2) a diploma or certificate of graduation from an existing school or institution <br />of learning outside the State of California, together with a certified transcript of <br />the applicant's school records showing completion of a course of at least five <br />hundred hours wherein theory, method, profession and work of massage is taught <br />and a copy of the school's approval by its State Department of Education., or <br /> <br />(3) written proof that the applicant has been lawfully employed as a massagist for <br />at least two years prior to the filing of the application." <br /> <br />4. RPD is then given the opportunity to rebut the evidence submitted by the appellant. <br /> <br />5. The hearing is closed following all testimony. <br /> <br />6. The Committee may uphold, reverse, or modify the decision of the Chief of Police. In <br />reaching a decision in this case, the Committee determines whether appellant has complied <br />with the requirements ofRMC section 5.52.050. 1. <br /> <br />2-1 <br /> <br />O:ICycoml WPDocslDO 171POO 1 100005921. WPD <br />