|
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
<br />
<br /> COUNCI LME N
<br />
<br /> Minutes of ~e~ular Me~in~ of ~he City Council
<br />
<br /> ,:6,, ,, ,,, ,,, ,,,
<br /> Time of MeekinS: 3:00
<br /> Place of Meeting: Council Chamber, Ci~y Hall wARDS ',~',2',3',4',5',~',7',
<br />
<br /> Roll Call: Presen~ '
<br />
<br />',~e Invocation was ~iven by Councilwoman Frizzel.
<br />
<br />]~e PiedEe of ~leEiance was Siren ~o ~he TieS.
<br />
<br /> MI~TES
<br /> ~e Minu~es of the MeetinSs of January 20, 1981, were approved as corrected co show Motion
<br /> ~hat Zone CO was approved for ZooinS Case R-~5-790 without conditions. (See PaBe Second
<br /> 66-324. ) All Ayes
<br />
<br />The Chair recoEnized the presence in the audience of Bud Luppino represenning the La
<br />Sierra Chamber of Co~mnerce.
<br />
<br />PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE I%FE CITY COD'NCIL AT 3:00 P.M.
<br />
<br /> ZONING CASE C-I6-801 - 10800 BLOCK ARLINGTON AVENIIE - CU~ APPROVED
<br />3:00 P.M.--Hearing was called on the request of R. J. Pez-aula, Zoning Case C-16-801,
<br />for a conditional use per~ni= ~o establish, operate and maintain a 99-bed convalescent
<br />hospital on approximately 4.52 acres of land located in the 10800 block of Arlington
<br />Avenue, situa=ed on :he northeasterly side of Arlington Avenue between Sandy hne and
<br />Mitchell Avenue, inZones R-1-80-Ri and C-3. As heretofore directed by the City Council,
<br />:he minutes of the City Planning Com~ssion pertaining =o this case are on file and
<br />are a part of ~he evidence submitted at =his hearing, whether or not any portion
<br />thereof is read or discussed. The com~municazion from =he Ci=y Planning Co~ssion
<br />stated =hat the Commission, by a vote of 9 ayes to 0 noes, approved =he condi=ional
<br />~uee permit, subject to the conditions listed in full in the Commission minutes relative
<br />~to this matter. The Planning Director presented departmental recommendatlgns, together
<br />with maps of the area. ~Lrs. Rober=a Pernula spoke in support of the conditional use
<br />~permi=. Oral protest~ were presented and considered. No written protests were pre-
<br />;sented. Questions were answered by the Planning Director and the Public Works Director.,
<br />~Following discussion, the hearing was officially closed. It was determined that
<br />[granting of :he conditional use permit will not have a significant adverse environmen-
<br />ttel effect. The action of the City Planning Co~ission in approving the condizional
<br />~use permi=, subject to the conditions listed in the Co~u~ission minutes, was upheld.
<br />
<br />~COUNCILMEM3ER APPEARA/gCE BEFORE BOARDS ~ COMMISSIONS - REFERRED TO PROMOTION AND
<br />:INTERGOVER~TAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
<br />~Discussion followed on whether City Councilmembers should appear before Boards and
<br />iCo~m~issions. Questions were answered by the City Attorney. Following a brief discus-
<br />sion, this policy matter was referred to the City Council Promotion and
<br />Intergoverru~ental Affairs Committee ~o consider and present its recommendations ~o the
<br />iCity Council.
<br />
<br />Councilman Shepard entered during :he following hearing.
<br />
<br />TRACT MAP 8146 (REVISED) - PROPERTY SITUATED BET. VIA VISTA & CENTURY - APPEAL - CONT,
<br />3:00 P.M.--Rearing was called on the appeal of 30hn W. Canty, J. F. Davidson
<br />~saociates, on behalf of Charter Development Corporation, from ~he decision of the
<br />city Planning Cou~nission in denying their request for a revised trot: map ~o divide
<br />29.4 acres of land into 32 lots on property situated between Via Vista Drive and
<br />Century Avenue, in Zone RC-2, Tract Map 8146 (Revised). As heretofore direc=ed by the
<br />City Council, the minutes of ~he City Planning Comission pertaining to this case are
<br />on file and are a part of the evidence submitted at this hearing, whether or not any
<br />portion ~hereof is read or discussed. The communication from %he Planning Departmen~
<br />sta~ed that ~he Proposition R Advisory Committee, by a vo~e of 3 ayes to 0 noes and I
<br />abstention, recommended approval of the requested variances. The co~=nunica~ion further
<br />advised that =he City Planning Commission, by a vote of 7 ayes to 2 noes, denied Tract
<br />Map 8146 (Revised). The Planning Director presented maps of the area; and recommended
<br />~hat, if =he City Council wishes =o approve the map, such approval be subject ~o ~he
<br />~conditions proposed by the Planning Depar=men= and lis~ed in full in the City Planning
<br />~Comission minutes pertaining to this matter. Mr. Canty, representing the appellant,
<br />~spoke in support of approval of the revised map. Written and oral protests of =he
<br />~appeal were presented and considered. Questions were answered by the City staff.
<br />%Following discussion, the hearing was continued =o ~arch i7, I981, at 1:30 p.m.; and
<br />
<br />Mozion
<br />Second
<br />All Ayes
<br />
<br />Motion
<br />Second
<br />Ayes
<br />Noes
<br />
<br />66-326
<br />
<br />
<br />
|