|
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
<br />
<br /> COUNCI LME N
<br />
<br /> ,,,',,,',,,
<br /> April 27, 1982 WARDS
<br />
<br />~a sl~xi~icant adverse environme~tal effect. The Plazm~zx~ Director presented
<br />|depar~xental recommendations. No written or oral protests ~ere presented. Hx. Dallas
<br />h~olmes requested coneider~t~on o~ corral. portions o~ ~e p~oposed amenc~ment by the ',
<br />~City C, ouncil Land Use Comm:Lttee, ~ollowizx~ diecuselon~ the hearin8 wee continued to 14orion :X ~
<br />h~lay 25, 1982, et 3 p.m., and the Cit7 Council Land ~ee Comm~Lttee ~ae requested to Second ~X:
<br />rev~ew the proposed amendment and presen~ its reco~nendations to the City Council. All Ayes
<br />~FURTHER HEARING- CASE PS-6~-801 - NORTRVEST CORNER LINDEN AND CANYON CREST - APPEAL -
<br />CONTINUED.
<br />~3:00 P.M.--Further hearin8 was called on the appeal of ~illiam ~. Hirsch, Lincoln
<br />ZFroperty Company N.C., lnc., from the decision of the Growth Management ~am~istrator
<br />iin denyin~ their request for a Residential Development Permit for the proposed develop-
<br />meat of approximately nine acres of land ~rlth 200 apartment units situated on the
<br />~northwes= comer of Linden Street and Canyon Crest Drive, Case PS-6~-801. In consider- Hotion
<br />ation of the request of Mr. Ernest N. Webb, Albert A. ~ebb Associates, representative Second ~X:
<br />of the appellant, the hearin~ was further continued to July 20, 1982, a~ r:30 p.m. All Ayes
<br />
<br />ZONING CASE V-88-812 - 6350-6390 COLb~IBUS AVENUE
<br />3:00 P.H.--Bearin~ was called on the request of K. Mc14illin, et al., ZoninZ Case
<br />V-88-812, for the followinZ variances on property situated on the southeast comer of
<br />Columbus Avenue and Ordway Street, located at 6350-6390 Columbus Avenue, in Zone 14-1:
<br />(1) to pernhtt a ~-foo~ encroachment into the required 20-foot setbacks by an existing
<br />building; (2) to permit an existing chain link fence ~o encroach up to 20 feet into
<br />the required 20-fooc setbacks along the front and street side yards; (3) to waive the
<br />landscaping requirement for the front and street side yard areas; (~) to permit one
<br />~parking space to encroach six ~eat into the required ~ront yard landscaped setback
<br />:area; and (5) to permit the use of redwood headers in lieu of six-inch concrete curbinZ
<br />:to separate planted areas from paved parking and drive areas. As heretofore directed
<br />:by the City Council, the minutes of the Board of Zoning Adjustment per~aining I:o this
<br />lcase are on file and are a part of the evidence submitted at this hearinS, whether or
<br />lnot any portion thereof is read or discussed. The co~,-ication from the Board of
<br />:Zonin8 Adjustment stated that the Board, by a vote of 7 ayes to 0 noes, approved
<br />~Requests (1) and (2); approved Request (3) with modifications, subject no the condi-
<br />:riots listed in full in the minutes of the Board pertainin8 to this matter; denied
<br />:Requests (4) and (5); and determined that the approved variances would not have a
<br />~slSnificant adverse environmental effect. The PlannitS Director presented depart-
<br />:mental recommendations, to$ether with raps of che area. Mr. Mc14illin spoke in support
<br />:of the action of the Board of Zonin$ Adjustment. No protests, written or oral, were
<br />~presented. Following a brief discussion, the hearinS was officially closed. The City
<br />~Council upheld the decision of the'Board of Zoning Adjustment, and determined the=
<br />:Z;Xy ca;ft the v.riancea..ub_ .c to r.co ded c itiun..have a
<br />:
<br /> adverse environmental effect.
<br />,
<br />~C0NSULTANT'~: REI~0RT
<br />
<br />PROPOSED DOT~1TOW1 HISTOEC PRESERVATION STUDY - CONT1~T~/ED
<br />~A writ:ten report was submitted from the Cit7 14annget and ~:he Planning Director,
<br />~presenting Phases I and TI of the Do~mto~m Historic Preeewation Study, identifyinS
<br />~proposed historic dis~:ricts in the Box~ato~ area, reco~end~.n$ ~:hat the Cil:y CouncLl
<br />~prel~xiuarlly approve the Doomtown Historic Districts ae recc~z~ended by ~he consultant
<br />and l:he Citizens Advisory Commit~ee and ae sho~a on Figure 4 ate:ached to the report,
<br />and authorize the consultant to proceed with the remainder o~ the study. Ms. Jill
<br />Starterr, Program 14anager for the Cityts consultant, Dons!d A. Cotton Associates,
<br />described 1:he proposed districts and answered questions from the City Council.
<br />Triterested persons present spoke regarding the report. Following discussion, the
<br />matter ~as continued ~o 14ay 1]., 1982, and the City Council Land Use ComaStree was
<br />requested to revie~ the report end present its recom~enchstions to the City Council.
<br />
<br />CONSIDERATION OF MATTER NOT ON THE PRINTED AGENDA
<br />
<br />AIRPORT MASTER PLAN - PRIZIO PROPERTY
<br />Pursuant to the request from the attorney for Mr. Prizio, owner of property included
<br />'in
<br />, the AIrport Master Plan~ that the property be removed from the Plan or purchased by
<br />'the
<br />m City, the City Council, on reco-~-endation from the Airport Commission, determined
<br />m
<br />
<br />Motion
<br />Second
<br />All Ayes
<br />
<br />14otiom
<br />Second
<br />All Ayes
<br />
<br />:x:
<br />
<br />:x:
<br /> :x:
<br />
<br />67-417
<br />
<br />
<br />
|