02-23-1982 CC MINUTES - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CITY OF RIVERSIDE COUNCILM E N Minutes of Regular Meeting of the City Council Date of Meeting: February 23, 1982 '~',0',~, ', < ';~', Time of Meeting: 3:00 P.M. Place of Meeting: Council Chamber, City Hall WARDS ....... = .................................................................................................... ~ROll Call: Present X~X~X~X~X~X~X~ ~The Invocation was given by Councilwoman Frizzel. , , ~The Pledge of Allegiance was given to the Flag. ~MINUTES ,The Minutes of the Meeting of February 16, 1982, were approved as submitted. Motion ~X~ Second ~X~ All Ayes PERSONAL APPEARANCE NARCONON FAr. John Duff, representing Narconon, a drug rehabilitation education program, briefly described =he project the organization plans to establish in Riverside~and answered questions from the City Council. The City Council thanked FAr. Duff and his associates for the presentation. PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AT 3:00 FURTHER HEARING - PROPOSED A~ENDMENT TO THE LAND USE AND OPEN SPACE E~E~ENTS OF THE GENERAL PLAN- CASE GP-3-812 - CENTRAL AVENUE WLY. OF CITY LIMITS - CONTINUED 3:00 P.M.--Fur=her hearing was called on the proposal of The Robert P. Warming=on ~Company, Case GP-3-812, to amend the Land Use and Open Space Elements of the tit7 of ~Riverside General Plan by deleting the existing Open Space and Regional Park (Sycamore ~Canyon) land use designations on the approximately 57.6 acres of vacant land situated ~approximately 800 feet southerly of Central Avenue adjacent to and westerly of the ~Riverside city limits, and placing this property in the Low Density Residential land ~use designation or other designation deemed more appropriate by the City Council. The ~matter was referred to the City Council Land Use Committee on September 15, 1981, and ~the hearing has been continued from time to time at the request of the applicant and ~the Land Use Committee. In consideration of the request of Mr. Ernest N. Webb, Motion ~X~ ~Albert A. Webb Associates, the applicant's representative, the hearing was further Second ~X~ continued to March 23, 1982, at 3 p.m. All Ayes , ~ZONING CASE R-27-812 - BLOCK BOUNDED BY UNIVERSITY, NINTH, MARKET AND MAIN STREET ~MALL - REZONING - ORDINANCE INTRODUCED ~3:00 P.M.--Hearing was called on the proposal of the Redevelopmen= Agency of the City ~of Riverside, Zoning Case R-27-812, to place the approximately 2% acres of vacant land ~covering the entire block bounded by University Avenue, Ninth Street, Market Street and Main Street Mall in Zone C-O and remove the same from Zones C-3 and P; with the ~City Council to also consider supplementing the requested zoning with Zones S and X. ~As heretofore directed by the City Council, the minutes of the City Planning Commission ~pertaining to this case are on file and are a part of the evidence submitted at this ~hearing, whether or not any portion thereof is read or discussed. The communication ~from the City Planning Commission stated that the Commission, by a vote of 9 ayes to 0 ~noes, approved Zone C-O, subject to the following conditions: (1) There shall be a ~two-year time limit in which to satisfy the following conditions and finalize this ~action. If the zoning is not adopted within two years of the date of introduction of ~the ordinance, the action taken on this petition shall be void. A time extension of =not more than one year may be requested of the City Council by letter. Such time ~extension request must be received by the City Clerk thirty days prior to the end of =the two-year limit; (2) The provision of public utility easements, water, street ~lights and electrical underground and/or overhead facilities and fees in accordance ~with the rules and regulations of the Public Utilities Department; (3) Installation of =curb and ~utter at ~0 feet from monument centerline, sidewalk and matching pavement on =University Avenue; (~) Removal of existing improvements on University Avenue~ (5) in- ks=alia=ion of an access ramp for the handicapped at Market and Ninth Streets; (6) Off- ~site improvemen~ plans to be approved by the Public Works Department, and a surety ~posted to guarantee the required off-site improvements prior to the final adoption of ~this zoning case; (7) Closure of existing driveway openings and size, number and ~location of new driveways to be determined at the time development takes place on the ~p p rty to Public Works Department specifications; (8) Removal and/or relocation of roe ~trees as required; (9) New driveways may require reiDca=ion or replacement of traffic 67-330