10-26-1982 CC MINUTES - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CITY OF RIVERSIDE COUNCI LME N Date of Meeting: October 26, 1982 Time of Meeting: 3:00 P.M. ',~, ', ', '~ ', ', ', ~Roll Call: Present X X A X~X~X~X~ ,Cou c lman Buster presided in the abeence of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore. ~The Invocation was given by Councilwoman Frizzel. iThe Pledge of Allegiance was given to the FlaS. iMINUTES lThe Minutes of the Meetin8 of October 19, 1982, were approved as submitted. Motion ]X[ Second Ayes X] .X,X.X,X, Not Voting X: PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AT 3:00 P.M. FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE FOR NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM - ORDINANCE INTRODUCED ~3:00 P.M.--Hearing was called on the proposal of the City of Riverside to establish ~standard8 and procedures for implementins the National Flood Insurance Program in ~regard to the regulation of flood hazard areas. As heretofore directed by the City ~Council, the minutes of the City PlanninS Commission and the Environmental Protection ~Gor~nission pertainin~ to this case are on file and are a part of the evidence submitted 'at this hearing, whether or not any portion thereof is read or discussed. The communi- ~cation from the City Planning Commission stated that the Commission, By a vote of ~ ayes to 0 noes, approved the PlanninS Department staff's recommendation that the ~City Council adopt the appropriate ordinance as indicated in their minutes. The ~communication from the Environmental Protection Commission advised that the Commission, ~by a vote of 8 ayes to 0 noes, determined that the proposed ordinance implementins the ~National Flood Insurance ProSram with reSard to the regulation of flood hazard areas ~would not have a significant adverse environmental effect. A written report was ~submitted from the City Manager and the Planning Director, concurred in by the Public ~Works Director, reconmendinS that the City Council (1) concur with the reco~nendation ]of the Environmental Protection Gommission that adoption of the proposed ordinance ] p menring the National Flood Insurance Program in Riverside will not have a siSnifi- im le ca adverse effect on the environment; and (2) concur with the reco~endation of the ,C~ty Planning Commission and adopt the ordinance attached to the report. The PlanninS ~Director recommended that the provisions of the ordinance become operative 3anuary 6, ~1983. No one was present wishin~ to speak on the matter. No ~rit~en protests were ipresented. The hearing was officially closed. It was determined that adoption of the ~proposed ordinance implementing the National Flood Insurance ProMram in Riverside ,would not have a significant adverse environmental effect~ and an ordinance entitled, ~"An Ordinance of the City of Riverside, California, ReEulating Flood Hazard Areas and Motion ]X~ ImplementinE the National Flood Insurance Program," was presented and introduced, with Second ]X~ ,the addition of a section specifyinM that the operative date shall be 3anuary 6, 1983. All Ayes ~Mayor Brown entered at this time, assumed the Chair and presided. ]ZONING CASE C-2-823 - 4975 VAN BUREN BOULEVARD - APPEAL - APPROVED IN PART ~3:00 P.M.--Hearin~ was called on the appeal of Bill Jhawar of certain of the condition8 ~of the City Planning Co~ission in approving his request for a conditional use permit ~to establish, operate and maintain a mini-market in conjunction with an existing ~Easoline service station previously established without a conditional use permit on ~property situated on the northeasterly corner of Van Buren Boulevard and Colorado :Avenue, located at 4975 Van Buren Boulevard, in Zones C-4-D, tentatively approved for ~Zone C-3, Zoning Case C-2-823. As heretofore directed by the City Council, the minutes ~of the City Planning Commission pertaining to this case are on file and are a part of :the evidence submitted at this hearing, whether or not any portion thereof is read or ~discussed. The communication from the City PlanninS Commission stated that the Commis- ' io s n by a vote of 8 ayes to 0 noes, approved the conditional use permit subject to 'the e conditions listed in full in the Commission minutes relating to this matter; ~determined that the conditional use permit will not have a significant adverse environ- [ ntal effect; and adopted the staff report and the environmental assessment as find- me 'in s , g . The Planning Director presented departmental recommendations, together with maps of the area. Representatives of Mr. Jhawar spoke in support of the appeal, 68-143