|
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
<br />
<br /> COUNCI LME N
<br />
<br /> Minutes of Regular Meeting of the City Council
<br /> ',~7~'~,~,~'~,
<br /> Date of Meeting: February 22, 1993
<br /> · ~',o',~, ', ~ ,~',
<br /> Time of Meeting: 3:00 P.M.
<br /> Place of Meeting: Council Chamber, City Hall WARDS ~1~3~4~5~ 6~7~
<br />...................................................................................................................... ~_._~
<br /> :Ro 1 Call: Present :X:X:X:X:X:X X:
<br /> ,The Invocation was given by the Rabbi Philip Posner, Temple Beth El. ,
<br /> :The Pledge of Allegiance was given to the Flag. ,
<br />
<br /> :The Minutes of the Meeting of February 15, 1983, were approved as submitted. Motion :X:
<br /> Second
<br /> All Ayes
<br />
<br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AT 3:00 P.M.
<br />
<br /> AMENDMENT TO RIVERSIDE ~NICIPAL CODE - CASE AMD-8-a23 - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
<br /> MOBILE HOME PARKS
<br /> 3:00 P.M.--Hearing was called on the proposed amendment of Section 19.10.020(15) of
<br /> the Riverside Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance) concerning various development stand-
<br /> ards for mobile home parks, Case AMD-g-823. As heretofore directed by the City Council,;
<br /> the minutes of the City Planning Com~nission and the Environmental Protection Commission
<br /> pertaining to this case are on file and are a part of the evidence submitted at this
<br /> :hearing, whether or not any portion thereof is read or discussed. The communication
<br /> :from the City Planning Conanission stated that the Commission, by a vote of 8 ayes to
<br /> :0 noes, approved the amendment as presented and quoted in full in the Commission
<br /> :minutes pertaining to this matter. The communication from the Environmental Protection
<br /> Commission advised that the Commission, by a vote of S ayea to 0 noes, determined that
<br /> the amendment would not have a significant adverse environmental effect. The Planning
<br /> Director presented departmental recommendations and answered questions from the City
<br /> Council. No one was presenE wishing to speak on the matter. No written proEests were
<br /> ~presented. The hearing was officially closed. It was determined that the proposed
<br /> Code amendment would not have a significant adverse environmental effect, and the
<br /> ;staff report and the environmental assessment were adopted as findings. The ~unicipal Motion ~X' '
<br /> Code amendment was approved as presented, and the City Attorney was requested to Second '
<br /> ,prepare the appropriate ordinance for introduction. All Ayes '
<br />
<br /> ~ZONING CASE R-26-823 - SWLY. OF TRAFALGAR WLY. OF ALESSANDRO - REZONING - ORDINANCE
<br /> ~INTRODUCED
<br /> ~3:00 P.M.--Hearing was called on the proposal of the City of Riverside, Zoning Case !
<br /> ~R-26-823, to place the approximately 13.5 acres of undeveloped land situated southwest-
<br /> ierly of Trafalgar Avenue westerly of Alessandro Boulevard in Zones R-i-80 and RC and ,
<br /> ,remove the same from Zones R-l-80, R-l-130 and RC. As heretofore directed by the City
<br /> ,Councx1, the minutes of the City Planning Commission pertaining to this case are on
<br /> ~file and are a part of the evidence submitted at this hearing, whether or not any
<br /> portion thereof is read or discussed. The communication from the City Planning Commis-
<br /> ~sion stated that the Commission, by a vote of 9 ayes to 0 noes, approved Zones R-l-80,
<br /> ,RC and WC, subject to the following conditions: (1) There sh~ll be a two-year time
<br /> ~limit in which to satisfy the following conditions and finalize this action. If the
<br /> ~zoning is not adopted within two years of the date of introduction of the ordinance,
<br /> 'the action taken on this petition shall be void. A time extension of not more than
<br /> "one year may be requested of the City Council by letter. Such time extension request
<br /> ~must be received by the City Clerk thirty days prior to the end of the two-year limit;
<br /> 'and (2) The following rezoning shall be approved: (a) Tract 9419--Lots 1 and 2:
<br /> ~Zones R-l-130, RC and WC to Zones R-I-80 and WC; (b) Tract 9419-1--Lot 9: Zone R-l-80
<br /> 'to Zone R-i-80 (Proposition R correction); (c) Tract 9419-2--Lots 1 through 5: Zone
<br /> ~R-1-80 to Zone R-l-80 (Proposition R correction); (d) Tract 9419-3--Lot 1: Zones RC
<br /> 'and WC to Zones R-l-80 and WC; Lot 2: Zones R-l-130 and RC to Zone R-l-80; Lots 3 and
<br /> ~4: Zones R-l-130, WC and RC to Zones WC and RC; Lot 5: Zones R-l-130 and RC to
<br /> ~Zone RC; Lots 9 through 14, 16 and 17: Zones R-l-130 and RC to Zone R-l-80; Lots 18
<br /> ~through 20: Zone R-I-130 to Zone R-l-80; and Lot 15: Zone RC to Zone RC (Proposition R~
<br /> :confirmation). In approving the above.rezoning, the Planning Commission finds that ~ '
<br /> 'the ,
<br /> , rezoning furthers the purposes of Proposition R by creating a logical division
<br /> l~n between the more urbanized area located generally on slopes of less than 15 percent'
<br /> e
<br />
<br />68-293
<br />
<br />
<br />
|