|
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
<br />
<br /> COUNCI LME N
<br />
<br /> Minutes of Regular Meeting of the City Council ',~.~6~O,~.~
<br /> Time o~ ~eeC~8: 3:00 ~.~. ',,~, ,~,,"~',,',,',,
<br />............................................................. WARDS
<br />
<br /> ~ Cal~: Present
<br /> ~The Invocation was Eiv~ by the Ray. Jo~ ~land, ~gnolia Baptist ~urch.
<br /> ~e Pledge of Allegiance was given to the Flag.
<br />
<br /> ~ MI~TES
<br /> l~e Minutes of the Meetings of Jan~ 14 and 18, 1983, were approved ~ sub~tted. Motion
<br /> Sec~d ~ X~
<br /> ~1 Ayes
<br /> ~PUBLIC H~INGS BEFO~ M CI~ COUNCIL AT 3:00 P.M.
<br />
<br /> ,F~ER H~RING - V~ B~EN BO~ ~SES~ DIS~ICT - ~GIER'S tORT -
<br /> PROCE~INGS A~E - MSOLUTION
<br /> 3:00 P.M.--Further hearing was call~ on the Report of the City Engineer for the
<br /> stree~ improvments consisting of Portla~ c~ent concrete sid~alb where nec~sa~
<br /> along the westerly side of Van B~en ~ulevar~ ~=ween ~yes a~ ~son Streets and a
<br /> wheelc~ir ramp at Hayes Street ~=hin the City of Riverside, ~aer the provisions of
<br /> the Improvement Act of 1911. ~e hear~g had been continued fr~ Nov~ber 23, 1982,
<br /> a= the reco~endation of the Public Wor~ Director who advised =he City C~ncil that
<br /> both property o~ers involved were considering constructing the sid~al~ theMelves.
<br /> A written report was su~i=ted fr~ the City ~ger ~d the Public Wor~ Director
<br /> advising t~E the sidewalk construction has been c~pleted ~der ~ private contracts
<br /> and a City contract of $828, the City participation having been approved by the City
<br /> Council on Janua~ 12, 1982, as an M~ project; a~ recmen~ing that the public
<br /> hearing be closed and the project a~oned. No one was present ~shins to speak on
<br /> the matter. No ~i=ten protests were presented. ~e hearing was officially closed;
<br /> and Resolution No. 14877 of the City ~cil of the City of ~verside, Califomia,
<br /> Ordering the Aba~o~nt of the Proceedings for the Improveant ~ Portions of the
<br /> ~Westerly Side of Van Burst Boul~ard Between ~yes and ~son Streets ~ the Proposed
<br /> 'Van Burst Boulevard ~sessm~= District as Described ~ Resolution of Intention
<br /> ~N~ber 14803; and Temina=ing Said Proceedings, ~s presented; and the title ha~ng ~=ion ~X~
<br /> ~been read, and further read~g waive~ by the u~us cons~t of Councih~bers Sec~d .X,
<br /> ~present, was adopted. ~1 Ayes
<br />
<br /> ~R~ H~ING - ZONI~ CASE R-1~823 - ~Y. S~E ~I~O BE~ LI~ ~ ~I~ -
<br /> ~P~ - WIT~
<br /> =3:00 P.M.--Further hearing was called on the appeal of H. ~oaas ~rtin, Jr., ~r=in
<br /> ,In estment Co~any, et el., fr~ the decision of the City Planning C~ssion in
<br /> ~denyins their request to add Zone BP to the approxm=ely ~ acres of land (two par-
<br /> ~cels) within a 17-acre, 13-parcel proposed industrial development (one building under
<br /> ~construction) siteted on the westerly side of ~icago Avenue between Linden and ~ird
<br /> =Streets in Zones M-1 and ~, bning ~se R-19-823. ~e h~ring was proceded ~=h,
<br /> ~having been continued from January 11~ 1983, a= the request of the appellant's repre-
<br /> ,sentdrive. ~e Planning Director advised the City Co~cil that the applicant has Motion
<br /> ~decided ~o withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, ~he City Co~cil granted the request to Second ~X
<br /> withdraw the appeal of the Pla~ing C~ission's d~ial of the rezoning request. All Ayes
<br /> ~ZONING C~E R-22-823 - 3658 MO~OE S~EET - ~ZONING - O~IN~CE I~RODU~
<br /> ~3'00 P.M.--Hearing was called on the proposal of Albert A. Webb ~sociates, et el.
<br /> Zoning Case R-22-823, to place the approximtely .20 acre of land developed ~th a
<br /> single-family residence (to be rmoved), proposed for a residential condomini~ devel-
<br /> opment, situated on the southwesterly side of Monroe Street, being at 3658 Monroe
<br /> Street, in Zone R-3 and r~ove the same from ~ne R-1-65. ~ heretofore directed by
<br /> the City Council, the minutes of the City Pla~ing C~ission per=ain~g to this case
<br /> are on file and are a part of the evidence submitted at this hearing, whether or not
<br /> any portion thereof is read or discussed. ~e comunication from the City Planning
<br /> Co~ission stated t~t the Co~ission, by a vote of 7 ayes to 0 noes, approved Zones
<br /> R-3-S-2 subject to the following conditions: (1) ~ere shall be a two-year time li~t
<br /> in which to satisfy the following conditions and finalize this action. If the zoning
<br /> Is not adopted within two years of the date of introduction of the ordinance, the
<br /> action taken on this petition s~ll be void. A t~e extension of not more than one
<br /> ~year may be requested of the City Council by letter. Such time extension request must
<br /> 'be
<br /> , received by the City Clerk thirty days prior to the ~d of the two-year limit;
<br />
<br />68-260
<br />
<br />
<br />
|