Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF RIVERSIDE <br /> <br /> COUNCI LME N <br /> <br /> Minutes of Regular Meeting of the City Council <br /> Date of Meeting: March 27, 1984 <br /> '~',o',~, ', ~ ,,o,, <br /> Time of Meeting: 3:00 P.M. ',~', ~, ', '~ '~ ', ', <br />........ ~.gL~;;z~..~m.cj,L;_~.q~ ............................................. <br /> <br /> ,Roll Call: Present <br /> ,~he Znvocation was given by the Rev. Gloria ~rady, Living Word ~ible hstitute. <br /> The PZedge of AZlegiance was g~ven to the ~lag. <br /> <br /> MINUTES <br /> The Minutes of the Meeting of March 20, 1984, were approved as submitted. Motion <br /> Second <br /> All Ayes <br /> <br /> Councilwoman Mansfield entered at this time. <br /> <br /> Mayor Brown announced that Councilman Loveridge is absent from the meeting as he is in <br /> ~Washington, D.C. <br /> , <br /> <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE THE CIT~ COUNCIL AT 3:00 P.M. <br /> ~ZONING CASE R-30-834 - CENTRAL ADJACENT TO AT&SF RAILROAD - REZONING - ORDINANCE <br /> ~ INTRODUCED <br /> ~3:00 P.M.--Hearing was called on the proposal of Riverside M~numental Co., Zoning Case <br /> ~R-30-834, to place the approximately .64 acre of vacant land situated on the north <br /> ~side of Central Avenue ad3acent on the west to the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe <br /> ~Railroad, westerly of Olivewood Cemetery, in Zone C-3 and remove the same from Zone <br /> ~R-1-80; with the City Council to also consider supplementing the requested zoning with <br /> ~Zones S and X. As heretofore directed by the City Council, the minutes of the City <br /> ~Planning Com~uLssion pertaining to this case are on file and are a part of the evidence <br /> =submitted at this hearing, whether or not any portion thereof is read or discussed. <br /> ~The communication from the City Planning Commission stated that the Commission, by a <br /> ,vote of 8 ayes to 0 noes, approved Zones C-3-S-i on the northerly 133 feet and Zones <br /> RO-S-1 on the remainder, subject to the following conditions: (1) There shall be a <br /> two-year time limit in which to satisfy the following conditions and finalize this <br /> action. If the zoning is not adopted within two years of the date of introduction of <br /> the ordinance, the action taken on this petition shall be void. A time extension of <br /> not more than one year may be requested of the City Council by letter. Such time <br /> extension request must be received by the City Clerk 30 days prior to the end of the <br /> two-year limit; (2) The provision of public utility easements, water, street lights <br /> and electrical underground and/or overhead facilities and fees in accordance with the <br /> rules and regulations of the Public Utilities Department; (3) By covenant executed <br /> concurrently with adoption of the rezoning, the applicant shall agree to limit signing <br /> of the entire sine to that allowed in Zone RO; (4) Zones RO-S-1 (Restricted Office and <br /> Single-Story Height of Buildings Combining Zones) shall apply to the entire site <br /> except for the most northerly 133 feet which shall be in Zones C-3-S-I (General Commer- <br /> cial and Single-Story Height of Buildings Combining Zones); (5) Installation of a <br /> Class 2 bikeway on Central Avenue to Public Works Department specifications; (6) A <br /> ~surety prepared by the Public Works Department to be posted to guarantee the required <br /> off-site improvements prior to the final adoption of this zoning case; (7) Installation <br /> ;of six-foot-high chain link fence along the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad <br /> ;right-of-way; and (8) Size, number and location of driveways per plot plan approval <br /> and to Public Works Department specifications; determined that the proposed rezoning <br /> ;would not have a significant adverse environmental effect; and adopted the staff <br /> ,report and the environmental assessment as findings. The Planning Director presented <br /> ,maps of the area, and a clarification of the conditions that a covenant shall reflect <br /> ,that contractor offices within the RO-zoned portion and contractor storage within the <br /> &C-3-zoned portion would be the limit of the use, except for similar low-intensity of- <br /> 'lice uses in the RO zone. No one was present wishing to speak on the matter. One wri~ <br /> ,ten protest was presented and considered. Following discussion, the hearing was offi- <br /> ,cially closed. Zones C-3-S-t were approved on the northerly 133 feet and Zones RO-S-1 <br /> on The remainder, subject to the recommended conditions as clarified by the Flanning <br /> Director; it was determined that the rezoning would not have a significant adverse Motion <br /> environmental effect; the staff report and the environmental assessment were adopted Second ~X <br /> as findings; and the ordinance was introduced. All Ayes <br /> , <br /> , <br /> <br />69-392 <br /> <br /> <br />