01-22-1985 CC MINUTES - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CITY OF RIVERSIDE COUNCILMEMBERS Date of Meeting: January 22, 1985 ' Time of Meeting: 3:00 P.M. Place of Meeting: Council Chamber, City Hall .... · ~ .......................... WARDS *~e ~nvocaC~ou vas g~ven by the ~ev. David Just, K~vers~de Co~un~c~ Foursq~re Church., *~e P~edge of ~Ze8~ance vas g~veu co the F~a8. I~TES ,~e ~nuCes of the Heecin~ of Janua~ 15, 1985, ~ere approved as submitted. ~Cion Second IX al Ayes [P~LIC ~INGS BEFO~ ~E CI~ CO~CIL AT 3:00 P.M. iAMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELM OF THE GENERAL PLAN - CANE GP-14-845 - BRADLEY AND ~GOLDEN STAR 3:00 P.M.--Hearing was called on the proposal of Gary Roberrs, Roberrs Development, Case GP-14-845, to amend the Land Use Element of the City of Riverside General Plan by deleting the Very Low Density Residential-B (average 0.5 dwelling unit per acre) land use designation from approximately ten vacant acres of land situated on the southwest comer of Bradley Street and Golden Star Avenue, and placing this property in the Low Density Residential (average three dwelling units per acre) land use designation or other land use designations deemed more appropriate by the City Council. As heretofore directed by the City Council, the minutes of the City Planning Commission and the Environmental Protection Co--~ission pertaining to this case are on file and are a part of the evidence submitted at this hearing, whether or not any ~portion thereof is read or discussed. The co~mmnication from the City Planning ~Commission stated that the Go--~ission, by a vote of 7 ayes to 0 noes, approved the ~Very Low Density Residential-A land use designation (average 1.5 dwelling units per ,acre), subject to the condition that the Legal Department be requested to prepare, ~within 30 days of the date of approval of this case, the necessary resolution for City ,Council adoption to amend the General Plan Land Use Element. The co~unication from the Environmental Protection Commission advised that the Com~.ission, by a vote of 6 ayes to 0 noes, determined that approval of the Very Low Density Residential-A land use designation would not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The Planning Director presented departmental recomaendations, together with maps of the area. No protests, written or oral, were presented. The hearing was officially closed. It was determined that the General Plan amendment would not have a signifi- cant adverse environmental effect; and the staff report and the environmental assess- ment were adopted as findings. The proposed General Plan amendment was approved, removing the subject property from the Very Low Density Residential-B land use designation and placing it in the Very Low Density Residential-A land use designation and the City Attorney was requested to prepare the appropriate resolution for adoption within 30 days. FURTHER HEARING - ZONING CASE R-31-845 - 3659 CENTRAL AVENUE - APPEAL GRANTED - 0RDINANCE INTRODUCED 3:00 P.M.--Further hearing was called on the appeal of P. D. Lippert, Real Estate ~Representative, ARC0 Petroleum Products Company, relative to the conditions of ap- :proval of the City Planning Commission regarding their request to place the approxi- imately .6 acre of land, developed with a service station, located at 3659 Central ~Avenue, situated on the northeast corner of Central and De Anza Avenues, in Zone C-3 :and remove the same from Zone C-4; with the City Council to also consider supplement- ~ing the requested zoning with Zones S and X, Zoning Case R-31-845. The hearing had ~been continued from December 4, 1984, and January 8, 1985, at the request of the :appellant. As heretofore directed by the City Council, the minutes of the City ~Planning Commission pertaining to this case are on file and are a part of the evidence =submitted at this hearing, whether or not any portion thereof is read or discussed. =The communication from the City Planning Co~n~ission stated that the Commission, by a =vote of 6 ayes to 0 noes, approved Zone C-3 subject to the following conditions: =(1) There shall be a two-year time limit in which to satisfy the following conditions ~and finalize this action. If the zoning case filed for this property is not adopted ~within two years of the date of introduction of the ordinance, the action taken on ~this petition shall be void. A time extension of not more than one year may be }requested of the City Council by letter. Such time extension request must be received Motion Second All Ayes 70-307