Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF RIVERSIDE <br /> <br /> COUNCI LMEMBERS <br /> <br /> ',, <br />..... .............................................. <br /> <br /> Ha~o~ ~o~ csZZed the meeC~ ~o o~de~, a~d advised C~ Couac~Zvo~ Ha~sE~eZd was ~b- <br /> se~ ~ecsuse o~ ~ZZ~ess. <br /> <br /> The Invocation vas ~iven b~ Councilman Bo~rs. <br /> <br /> The PledSe of AlleZiance was ~iven =o the Fla~. <br /> <br /> MI~TES <br /> The Minu~es of ~he ~ee~in~ of September 20, 1988, were approved as submitted. Motion ~v~ <br /> Second <br /> ~-, <br /> All Ayes <br /> <br /> PUBLIC ~ING BEFO~ T~ CI~ ~UNCIL AT 3 <br /> <br /> F~R ~ING - ZONING ~E R-14-867 ~ ~NT TO ~ RI~IDE ~ P~ ~ <br /> NORTHSIDE CO~NI~ M (~E GP-6-867) - FIRST, ~BERRY ~ SOW~RN PACIFIC ~I~O~ <br /> RIGHT~F-WAY - ORDIN~a I~ODUaD <br /> 3 P.M.--Further heari~ was c~led on c~ proposal of ~he City of Riverside ~o place =he <br /> approximately 15.75 acres of land ~unded ~ Firs= Street on ~he sou~h, Hulber~ Street <br /> on the east, =he Sou=Mm Pacific ~ilroad riZhC-of-vay on the north and Orange Street <br /> on ~he ~sc, in Zone R-1-65 and remove =M same fr~ Zones R-3, R-2 and RO, Zo~ng Case <br /> R-14-867. Consideration ~s also Ziven =o mendin~ ~he CiCy of ~verside General Plan <br /> and the Nor=hside Cmuni=y Phn ~ remo~ the above-described property from the Me- <br /> di~ High Density Residential (average 12 dwellin~ units per acre) 1aM use desi~=ion <br /> and placi~ it in the Hedi~ Low Density (averaZe 4 d~lli~ units per acre) land use <br /> aesi~Cion, Case GP-6-867. The henries Md ~en continued fr~ time ~o Eime over the <br /> past 18 months pendi~ comple~ion of an expanded Do~o~ Co~uni~y Plan. As heretofore <br /> direc=ed by C~ Ci=y Council, the minu~es of =he City Plannin~ Conission and che Envi- <br /> ronen=al Pro=ec=ton Co~ssion per=ai~ to Chese cases are on file and are a part of <br /> the evidence su~i==ed at =his hearinS, whe=~r or not any portion =hereof is read or <br /> discussed. The comunica=ton fr~ =he City Plan~ Co~ssion stated =hac the Com~s- <br /> sion, by a vo~e of 6 ayes ~o 3 noes, denied the zonin8 case and General Plan ~en~en=. <br /> The c~unicaCion fr~ the Enviro~n~al Protection Com~ssion advised =ha= the Conis- <br /> sfon, by a vote of 8 ayes ~o 0 noes, de=e~ned =~C approval of Zone R-1-65 and che Me- <br /> df~ Low Density Residennial land use desiEna=ion for the encire case area ~11 noc ~ve <br /> a sianifican= adverse effect on C~ enviro~en=. A ~i==en supplemental report dated <br /> September 28, 1988, was su~i=~ed from Ehe Plan~ Depan~nt reconendtn~ Chat =he <br /> Ci=y Council (1) concur ~ch the rec~mendacion of =~ EnviromenCal ProCecEion Comis- <br /> sion C~C placi~ pemanen= Zone R-1-65 and the Medium Low Density Residential land use <br /> desia~cion on =he subject properties would not Mve a siSnifican= effect on =he environ- <br /> menc; (2) introduce an ordiunce ~o place the subJecn 15.75 acres in a pedant Zone <br /> R-1-65--=his at=ion to ~ taken ~i=h ~he understandin8 tM=, should this zonin~ catedo~ <br /> non be consis=enE ~Ch Che General Plan desi~na:lon ultimately applied ~o =hls area as <br /> parc of che expanded Do~=o~ Co~untcy Plan program, appropria=ely consis=en= zonfn[ <br /> ~11 Chen be applied; (3) request the LeEal Depar=~nt Eo prepare the appropriate resolu- <br /> cion ~endinE =he General Plan and Nornhslde C~u~:y Plan by placin8 =he sub3ec= prop- <br /> erty in =he Medium Lo~ Density Residenrial land use aesiEna=ion; and (4) reconend cha= <br /> the CiEy Plannin~ Conission hold =he necessa~ public hearings Co place the balance of <br /> :he area presennly in an interim Zone R-1-65 aM ou=side Ehe limiCs of =his zo~ case <br /> in a pemanenE Zo~ R-1-65--such an action ~in~ consis=ent ~=h =he prelimi~ recom- <br /> mendaCion of =he co~untCy plan sEXy currently uMe~ay and allo~ for zoni~ con=inn- <br /> icy follo~n~ expira~ion of ~he interim R-1-65 zonin~ on November 25, 1988. The Plan- <br /> ni~ Direc=or reread ~he cases and presenred maps of the area. In=eres=ed persons <br /> spo~ in suppor: of =he rezonin~ and General Plan ~endmen~. ~ri=Cen and oral protests <br /> were presented and considered. Follo~ discussion, the public hearf~ was officially Motion <br /> ~X~ <br /> closed. The City Council approved Recommendations (1) through (4) as s~a~ed above; and Second , <br /> the ordi~nce was introduced. All Ayes <br /> <br /> SCAG P~SE~ATION - REGION~ GRO~ ~AGE~NT PL~ <br /> At 3:30 p.m., the City Council adjoumed; and reconvened at 5 p.m., in the Mayor's Cere- <br /> monial Room, ~th all Members present except Councilworn Mansfield, and ~th Mayor Pro <br /> Tempore Frizzel presiding in the absence of Mayor Brow, for a dinner meeting with repre- <br /> sentatives of Southem California Association of Governments. Present were SCAG staff <br /> members Eric Haley, Principal Gover~ental Affairs Officer, Jim Goshell, Director of <br /> Transportation, and Arnie She~ood, Director of Conunity and Economic Development. <br /> <br />74-116 <br /> <br /> <br />