CITY OF RIVERSIDE
<br />
<br />COUNCI LMEMBERS
<br />
<br />Minutes of Regular Meeting of the City Council ',,
<br />Date of Meeting:April 24, 1990
<br /> ,,
<br />Time of Meeting= 3 P.M. \ ',
<br />Place of Meeting: Council Chamber, City Hall ~\'~\
<br />
<br />Roll Call:
<br />
<br />The Invocation was given by Captain Terry Knapstead, Salvation Army.
<br />
<br />The Pledge of Allegiance was given to the Flag.
<br />
<br />MINUTES
<br />The Minutes of the Meeting of April 17, 1990, were approved as submitted.
<br />
<br />'Present
<br />
<br />Motion
<br />Second ,X,
<br />.All Ayes
<br />
<br />PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AT 3 P.M.
<br />
<br />AMENDMENT TO CITY CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE - BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE - RESOLUTION
<br />3 P.M.--Hearing was called to consider amending the City of Riverside conflict of inter-
<br />est code by adding the Budget Advisory Committee to those who file Form 730, pursuant to
<br />Government Code Section 87306. A conflict of interest code designates those employees,
<br />members, officers or consultants who make or participate in the making of decisions
<br />which may affect financial interests and who must disclose those interests on financial
<br />disclosure statements. A written report was presented from the City Clerk, concurred in
<br />by Assistant City Attorney Confer, recommending that the City Council (1) hear and con-
<br />sider objections and comments to the proposed amendment to the Conflict of Interest
<br />Code; and (2) close the public hearing, and adopt the appropriate resolution amending
<br />the Code for City board and commission members to add the Budget Advisory Committee to
<br />those boards and commissions which are required to file Statements of Economic Inter-
<br />ests. No one was present wishing to speak on the matter. No written protests were pre-
<br />sented. The public hearing was officially closed; and Resolution No. 17421 of the City
<br />Council of the City of Riverside, California, Amending Resolution No. 17397 by Amending
<br />in Its Entirety Appendix A to Add Budget Advisory Committee Members to the List of Those
<br />Who Are Designated Employees Under the Terms of the Conflict of Interest Code, was pre-
<br />sented; and the title having been read, and further reading waived by the unanimous con-
<br />sent of Councilmembers present, was adopted.
<br />
<br />ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN - OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT FOR TRACT
<br />20393-3 - RESOLUTION
<br />3 P.M.--Hearing was called on the proposed acquisition by the City of Riverside, through
<br />its powers of eminent domain, of a required storm drain easement for development of
<br />Tract 20393-3 in the City of Riverside. A written report was presented from the Aoting
<br />City Manager and the Administrative Services Director, concurred in by the City Attorney
<br />and the Public Works Director, recommending that the City Council adopt the appropriate
<br />Resolution of Necessity and authorize the City Attorney to commence eminent domain pro-
<br />ceedings to acquire the needed storm drain easement. No one was present wishing to
<br />speak on the matter. No written protests were presented. The hearing was officially
<br />closed; the recommendation was approved as presented; and Resolution No. 17422 of the
<br />City Council of the City of Riverside, California, Making Findings and Determinations
<br />Relating to the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of an Easement on Certain Real Property
<br />Necessary for Off-Site Storm Drainage for Tract 20393-3 in the City of Riverside; and
<br />Authorizing the City Attorney to Commence and Prosecute Proceedings in Eminent Domain,
<br />was presented; and the title having been read, and further reading waived by the unani-
<br />mous consent of Councilmembers present, was adopted.
<br />
<br />FURTHER HEARING - ZONING CASE V-9-823 (REVISED) - SEVENTH BETWEEN OTTAWA AND DWIGHT - AP-
<br />PEAL - CONTINUED
<br />3 P.M.--Further hearing was called on the appeal of Rot Burt, General Partner, Oak Tree
<br />Limited Partnership, from the decision of the Board of Administrative Appeals and Zoning
<br />Adjustment in denying his request for a revised variance to delete a condition of ap-
<br />proval of a previously approved variance case requiring all tenants to be 55 years of
<br />age or older within an apartment complex located at 1910, 1920, 1928, 1938 and 1946 Sev-
<br />enth Street, situated on the south side of Seventh Street between Ottawa Avenue and
<br />Dwight Avenue, in Zone R-3, Zoning Case V-9-823 (Revised). The hearing had been contin-
<br />ued from March 6, 1990, and April 10, 1990, and referred to the City Council Utility
<br />Services/Land Use/Energy Development Committee. In consideration of the recommendation
<br />from the Committee, the hearing was continued to May 8, 1990, at 2 p.m.
<br />
<br />FURTHER HEARING - ZONING CASES C-39-878 (REVISED) AND C-30-878 (REVISED) - 3445 AND
<br />3487 MADISON - APPEAL WITHDRAWN
<br />3 P.M.--Further hearing was called on the appeal of Linda Sheridan, Sheridan & Associ-
<br />ates, on behalf of Carl Karcher Ent., Inc. (Carl's Jr.), and E1 Pollo Loco, from the
<br />
<br />Motion
<br />Second
<br />All Ayes
<br />
<br />Motion
<br />Second
<br />All Ayes
<br />
<br />Motion
<br />Second
<br />All Ayes
<br />
<br />X
<br />
<br />x:
<br />
<br />75-430
<br />
<br />
<br />
|