Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF RIVERSIDE <br /> <br /> COUNCILMEMBERS <br /> <br />Minutes of Regular Meeting of the City Council \ <br />Date of Heeting: January 2, 1990 <br /> <br /> of .tl-s: city W ,DS <br /> <br />The Invocation ~s given ~ Counctl~n Clarke. <br /> <br />The Pledge of Allegiance ~as given to the Flag. <br /> <br />~I~ES <br />T~ ~inutes of the ~eetings of December 19 and 26, 1990, ~re approved as sub~tted. Motion <br /> Second <br /> All A~es <br /> <br /> Council~n Loveridge entered at this time. ~X~ <br /> <br />P~SZ~ATION <br />Hayor Bro~ presented a Plaq~ of A~reciation to Councilman Loveridge for his dedicated <br /> service as Hayor Pro Tepore fr~ Jul~ 1, 1989, through Dec~ber 31, 1989. <br /> <br />The CMtr recognized the pre~nce in the audience o~ Bob Stewart representing the Rive~ <br />side Ch~ber of C~erce, ~ch Biber represeutt~ the Arlington ~ber of Cohere, <br />Doug gardle representing the La Sierra CMmber of C~erce, Tm Estes representing the <br />~agnolta Center ~ber o~ Co~erce, ~uck Chandler representi~ the Hunter Park- <br />Northside C~ber of Cmrce and Lance Ciher representing the University-Canyon Crest <br />Ch~r of C~erce. <br /> <br /> CONSE~ C~E~ <br /> The follo~ng ires vere approved ~ one ~tton afft~iq the actions appropriate to <br /> those items listed on the Consent CaleMar aM as su~tted to the Cit~ Council for con- <br /> sideration; ~th the e~eption of t~ reports regarding fi~ncial ~pport ~or h~eless ~otton ~X~ <br /> progrog and private refuse hauler contracts, ~th o~ which were reoved to the Discus- Second ~X~ <br /> sion Calendar. All Ayes <br /> <br /> CI~ ~NG CO~ISSION <br /> <br /> ZONING CASE C-36-878 (~S~) - S~P CON, INC., ~ ~. - 1355 ~ESS~RO <br />A c~u~cation was presented ~r~ the City Plan~ C~sston ad~sing t~t, on Decer <br />bet 7, 1989, the C~ssion, ~ a vote of 9 a~es to 0 noes, approv~ subject to condi- <br />tions the request of Step Con, Inc., et al., Zo~ Case C-35-878 (Revised), ~or a re- <br />vised conditto~l use pe~t to ~dify a pre~ously approved ~ce station and mini <br />market, iucl~i~ approul of ~er a~ ~ne sales, ~thin a shoppi~ center under con- <br />st~ction at 1355 Alessandro Bodeyard, siteted approximately 11/~ miles east o~ Traut- <br />vein Road, in Zone C-2; and aleretained tMt t~ proposal would not Mve a stgMficant ad- <br />verse e~fect on the enviro~ent. It was deterned tMt the City Council ~uld ~t set <br />the matter ~or public heari~. <br /> <br /> ZONING CASE C-~3-889 (~S~) - PIERa S~ AUTOPLEX P~S - 11881 ~CNOLIA <br /> A c~untcation ~s presented ~rom the Cit~ Plan~ C~ssion advisi~ that, on Decer <br /> bet 7, 1989, the C~ssion, coutra~ in part to the Pla~tng Department's rec~menda- <br /> tton and ~ a vote of 9 ayes to 0 noes, appro~d subject to conditions the request of <br /> Pierce Street Autopie Partners, Zo~ Case C-~3-889 (Re,seal), for a re~sed condt- <br /> tio~l use pe~t for proposed signs which require variances ~or a proposed gasoline <br /> ser~ce station ~th ~ni ~r~t at 11881 ~agnolta Avenue, siteted at the north co~er <br /> of PIece Street aM ~agnolta Avenue, in Zo~ ~-1, tentative Zone C-2 under Zo~ng Cases <br /> R-65-856 and R-3~-889. Tb~ Planning Department reckmended approval in part, subject to <br /> conditions, o~ the requested conditio~l use petit. It ~s dete~ined that the City <br /> Council would not set the utter for public heari~. <br /> <br /> ZONING ~SE C-26-890 - ~SE~ L~ ~ - 891 B~I~ <br /> A c~unication was presented fr~ the Cit~ Plan~ng C~sston advist~ tMt, on Decer <br /> bet 7, 1989, the Co~ssion, ~ a vote of 9 a~es to 0 noes, approved subject to condi- <br /> tions the request of Gethse~ne Lutheran ~urch, ZoOrig Case C-26-890, ~or a conditio~l <br /> use petit to e~and a nonconfo~i~ church ~ adding a ~,~O-square-f~t classroom <br /> butldi~ a~ a 72~square-foo~ modular classro~ to the existi~ church facilit~ on ap- <br /> proxt~tel~ three acres of land at 891 Blaine Street, situated at the northeast co~er <br /> of Blaine Street and Canyon Crest Drive, in Zone R-3; a~ dete~ined t~t the proposal <br /> would not Mve a significant adverse effect on the enviro~ent. It vas dete~ined that <br /> the Ctt~ Council would not set the matter ~or public heari~. <br /> <br />75-25~ <br /> <br /> <br />