Laserfiche WebLink
: <br /> CITY OF RIVERSIDE <br /> <br /> COUNCi LMEMBERS <br /> <br />Minutes of Regular Meeting of the City Council <br /> <br />Time of Meett~: 9 A.M. <br />Place of MastiC: Council Ch~r, City Hall WARDS <br /> <br />Roll Call: Present ',X',X'X'X'X'X'X' <br />The Invocation was given By t~ Reverend Tho~s Ford. <br />The Pledge of Allegiance was given Co the Flag. <br /> <br />MI~S <br />The Minutes of the Meetings of OcCo~r 23 and 30, 1990, were approved as su~iCCed. Motion ,X, <br /> Second , X, <br /> All Ayes <br /> <br />~ SE~ATI ON <br />Jolene S. Anderson, President of Jolene S. Anderson Publishing Consultants, Inc., pre- <br />sented the first Tourist and Visitor Guide for Riverside. <br /> <br />The Chair recognized the presence in the audience of'Jolene Anderson representing the <br />Riverside Chabe= of C~e~e, Ma~ Moreland representing the Arlington C~Ber of Co~ <br />merce, Doug Wardle repre~nCi~ the La Sierra Cham~r of Coverts, Captain Zoli repre- <br />senti~ the Magnolia Center ~ber of C~e~e, Andy Meyers representing the Hunter <br />P~rk-NorChside Cham~r of Coheres, Janice Ne~an representing the University-Canyon <br />Crest Ch~Ber of Coheres and Mario Pere~ representing the Gre~cer Riverside Hispanic <br />Chamber of Coverts. <br /> <br />CONSE~ <br />The follo~ng items, preented ~o the City Council on the Consent Calendar for considera- ,X, <br />tion, were approved ~ one motion affi~ng the actions appropriate to each item. ~X~ <br /> <br />CITY PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />ZONING CASE C-21-723 (REVISED) - HURLBUT AMUSEMENT COMPANY, INC. (CASTLE AMUSEMENT PARK), <br />ET AL. - 3500 POLK <br />A communication was presented from the City Planning Commission advising that, on Octo- <br />ber 18, 1990, the Commission, by a vote of 9 ayes to 0 noes, approved subject to condi- <br />tions the request of Hurlbut Amusement Company, Inc. (Castle Amusement Park), etal., <br />Zoning Case C-21-723 (Revised), for a revised conditional use permit to install a new <br />ride within the existing amusement park at 3500 Polk Street, situated on the northwest <br />side of Diana Avenue between Polk Street and Park Sierra Drive, and at the west corner <br />of Park Sierra Drive and Diana Avenue, in Zone R-1-65; and determined that the proposal <br />would not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. A height variance has <br />also been requested. The Commission's approval was upheld by the City Council. <br /> <br />BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS AND ZONINd ADJUSTMENT <br /> <br />ZONING CASE V-61-901 - RACEWAY FORD - 3600 IOWA <br />A communication was presented from the Board of Administrative Appeals and Zoning Adjust- <br />ment advising that, on October 15, 1990, the Board, contrary to the Planning Depart- <br />ment's recommendation and by a vote of 6 ayes to 1 no, approved subject to conditions <br />the request of Raceway Ford, Zoning Case V-61-901, for the following variance to install <br />a tenant identification building sign for an existing automobile dealership at 3600 Iowa <br />Avenue, situated at the southeasterly comer of Iowa Avenue and Linden Street, in Zone <br />C-3: to allow an approximately 144-square-foot building sign where a maximum 100-square- <br />foot sign is permitted. The Planning Department recommended denial of the variance. <br />The City Council upheld the Board's recommendation. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION <br /> <br />CASE EPC-27-901 - PROPOSED REALIGNMENT - INDIANA EASTERLY OF BUCHANAN <br />A communication was presented from the Environmental Protection Cov, m~ ssion advising <br />that, on October 10, 1990., the Commission, by a vote of 10 ayes to 0 noes, determined <br />that, although a proposal by the City of Riverside to realign approximately 1,400 feet <br />of Indiana Avenue from 700 feet easterly of Buchanan Street to 2,100 feet easterly of Bu- <br />chanan Street, could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a <br />significant effect in this case if certain mitigating measures are required as condi- <br />tions of approval of the project, Case EPC-27-901. The Commission's finding was upheld <br />by the City Council. <br /> <br />Motion <br />Second <br />All Ayes <br /> <br />76-164 <br /> <br /> <br />