Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF RIVERSIDE <br /> <br /> COU NC I LM EMBERS <br /> <br /> Minutes. of Regular Meeti~ of the City Council ~ ~,~ <br /> Date of Meeting: April 16, 1991 <br />Time of Meeting: 9:00 A.M. <br />Place of Meeting: Council C~ber, City Hall WARDS <br />=Roll Call: Present <br /> <br />~yor Pro T~pore Buster presided in the absence of ~yor Frizzel, who ns a= ~rch ~r <br />=Force Ba~ on bus~ness. <br /> <br />=The Invocation ~s given by Dr. David Just, Chaplain, Riverside Co~ty Sheriff's Depart- <br /> <br />=The Pledge of ~legiance was given to the Flag. <br /> <br /> The M~nutes of the Meetings of April 9, 1991, were approved as subSfred. Motion <br />I Second ~X <br /> :All Ayes <br /> <br /> ~S~ATION <br /> Mayor Pro T~pore Buster presented a Procitation =o Barbara Loya, representing =he Com- <br /> munity Settlement Association, proclaf~ Saturday, April 20, 1991, as C~nity Settle- <br /> ment Association Health Fair E~o Day ~n the C~ty of Rivevs~de. <br /> <br />The C~ir reco~zed =he presence in =he audience of ~rk Haworth representing =he R~ <br />[erside Ch~ber of C~erce~ Ruth Howell representing =he Arlington Ch~r of C~evce, <br />sT~ Green represent~ the La Sierra Ch~ber of C~erce and ~nce Garrett representing <br />~=he ~gnolia Center Ch~ber of C~erce. <br /> <br />~ SE C <br />e fo lo g ~s, presented to =he City Council on the Consent Calendar for cons~dera- <br />:=ion, were approved ~ one motion affi~ng =he actions appropriate =o each ~t~; ~=h ~Mo=lon ~X~ <br />=additional c~en=s to =he report relative to Landscape ~innenance District No. 91-1 for Second X <br />=Tract 2~684. ~1 Ayes <br /> <br />[E~IRO~ FRO~ION COESSION <br />]CASE EPC-57-901 - ~OPOSED ~IGH~H~D P~ <br />=A c~m~cac~on was presented fr~ =he EnvYrosen=el Protection C~ss~on ad~sing <br />son ~rch 27, 1991, =he Co~ssion, ~ a vote of 8 ayes to 0 n~s, dete~ned =hat, al- <br />~ h h <br />st oug a proposal by =he C~=y of ~vers~de to develop a ne~gh~rhood park on an appvox~- <br />~ma=ely seven-acre vacant site generally ~unded ~ New Ridge Dr~ve =o the ~sn, Basilone <br />~Dr~ve to =he south, Caro~ood ~ay =o =he east, and Taft El~enta~ School to the north, <br />, Zone R-1-80, could ~ve a si~ificant effec~ on =he enviromnt~ there ~11 no= ~ a <br />]significant effect in this case if certain mitigating measures are agreed =o by the ap- <br />~plicant and are required as part of =he conditions of approval of =he project; and recom- <br />mended =hat ~he City Council adopt a ~=igated Negative Declaration, Case EPC-57-901. <br />The C~ission's findi~ ~s upheld by =he City Council, and the MiEiEated Negative Dec- <br />lard=ion was adopted. <br /> <br /> D~T E~IRO~ ~A~ ~PORT - 1991 AIR QU~I~ ~A~ ~ <br /> A c~unica=ion was presented fr~ ~he Enviro~ntal Pro=st=ion C~ssion ad~si~ <br />on April 10, 1991, the C~ssion reviewed a Draft Enviro~ental I~act Report (DEIR) <br />prepared by ~he South Code= ~r Quality ~uge~nt District f6r =he 1991 ~r Quality ~n- <br />a~ement Plan (A~); and, by a vote of 7 ayes to 0 noes, rec~naed =hat the City Coun- <br />cil (1) support in concept the proposed 1991 A~ and the findings of =he DEIR subject no <br />=he follo~ng: (a) that the 1991 A~ clarify =he relationship and req~r~ents of the <br />~local gover~ent la~ use, transportation and ener~ measures contained in Appendix IV E <br />of the 1991 A~ in c~parison =o the proposed indirect source con=to1 measures contained <br />in Appendix IV C of the Plan, (b) t~t =he 1991 AQ~ clearly state what measures are <br />going Co be enforced ~ regio~l mle~kin8 by =he District ~ich ~y, therefore, defer <br />,local governshE action until =he Dis=tic= mles are in place--this is particularly di- <br />, rec=ed towards ~hose indirect source measures that overlap Appendix IV E measures, <br />,(c) ~ha= the 1991 A~ should sta~e t~E local gover~en= implemn=a=ion measures sug- <br />gested in the Plan are a me~ of at=ions from which local governments can 'choose =o <br />,achieve a their fair s~re reductions in air e~ssions, and (d) =ha= =he 1991 AQ~ in- <br />~clude specific c~=men=s by the Dis=ric~, including time frees, ~o prancing model o~ <br />3di~nces and other progr~s for local govermnCs to u~ilize in fulfilling =heir responsi- <br />bilities under the AQ~; and (2) fomard =hess recomenda~ions =o the SCA~ for their <br />'consideration. The City Council upheld =he Co~ssion's recomendaUlons. <br /> <br />76-386 <br /> <br /> <br />