|
CiTY OF RIVERSIDE
<br />
<br />,_., COUNCI LMEMBERS
<br /> Minutes of Regular Meeting of the City Council \~ ~ ~. ~
<br /> Date of Meeting: January 22, 1991 ~,C~ ~,,1~,,
<br /> Time of Meeting: 2 P.M. XX%~\ i~\ ~ ~ ~ ~
<br /> Place of Meeting: Council Chinbet, City Hall WARDS ~1~2~4\s~6~7~
<br /> ' ' .X,X,X,
<br /> , Roll Call: Presen~ X X X X
<br />
<br /> , ~OSED SESSION
<br /> e The Mayor announced =~C ~he City Council w~ld recess =o a closed session to mee~ ~h
<br /> , its designated representatives regardt~ labor relacio~ matters purs~n= =o Gover~n=
<br /> ~ Code Set=ion 54957.6. The ~yor also announced a closed session pursuanE Eo Gove=en~
<br /> ,
<br /> ~ Code Set=ion 54956.9(a) =o co~er ~h its a=Eorney regar~ng pending litigation which
<br /> has been i~=iared fomlly and =o ~ich =he City is a par=~-the ~i=le of the litiga-
<br /> tion bei~ T & S Develo~ent, Inc., v. City of Riverside, e= al., Riverside County Supe-
<br /> rior Court Case No. 197998; as well as closed session pursuan~ =o Gover~en= Code Sec-
<br /> tion 54956.8 =o give ins=mc=ions =o =he Ci=y's negontaCor regardt~ negotiations ~=h
<br /> Riverside Air Semite and Parflits concerning ~he lease of property located at ~he Rtve~
<br /> side Municipal Airport.
<br />
<br />The Mayor and Members of the City Council recessed to the Conference Room adjoining the
<br />Council Chamber.
<br />
<br />The Mayor and Members of the City Count11 returned to the Council Chamber.
<br />
<br />PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AT 3 P.M.
<br />
<br />FURTHER ~EARING - ZONING CASE V-126-823 (REVISED) - 3590-3640 CENTRAL - APPEAL - CONT.
<br />3 P.M.--Further hearing was called on the appeal of Shari L. Reed, Vice President, Com-
<br />mercial Properties, Realty Center Management, Incorporated, on behelf of Riverside CPI,
<br />Ltd., relative to the decision of the Board of Admin/strative Appeals and Zor~Lng Adjust-
<br />ment regarding their request for the following revised variances for a revised cemprehen-
<br />sire sign program for an approximately 5.8-acre commercial/office complex at 3590
<br />through 3640 Central Avenue, situated on the south side of Central Avenue between San Di-
<br />ego and De Anza Avenues, in Zones C-2, P and RO| (A) to allow an approximately
<br />47-square-foot, 20-foot-high, four-sided, freestanding sign identifying an office/commer-
<br />cial complex where no such sip is permitted (only one 40-square-foot, eight-foot-high
<br />identification monument sign identifying the name of the commercial complex or the name
<br />of one tenant is permitted) and other freestanding signs already exist on this property;
<br />(B) to allow an approximately 18-square-foot, six-foot-high secondary identification mon-
<br />ument sign where no such sign is permitted; (C) to allow a 17-square-foot, sirfoot-high
<br />secondary freestanding identification sign where no such sign is permitted; (D) to allow
<br />two approximately lOS-square-foot canopy signs identifying the commercial complex where
<br />only occupancy signs are permitted; and (E) to delete a previously approved condition
<br />prohibiting additional building identification signs above the first floor, Zoning Case
<br />V-126-823 (Revised). This request modifies a previous variance approved for this commer-
<br />cial/office complex. The appellant is appealing the denial of Variance (A). The hear-
<br />ing had been continued from December 4, 1990, and referred to the City Council Utility
<br />Services/Land Use/Energy Development Committee for review and recommendation. In consid-
<br />eration of the request of the Land Use Committee, the hearing was further continued to
<br />February 5, 1991, at 2 p.m.
<br />
<br />FURTHER HEARING - ZONING CASE V-92-901 - 6910 StNDTRACK - APPEAL GRANTED - RESOLUTION
<br />3 P.M.--Further hearing was called on the appeal of Debbie OJeda from the decision of
<br />the Board of Administrative Appeals and Zoning Adjustment in denying her request for the
<br />following minor variance to legalize an existing six-foot-high block wall and 12-foot-
<br />high gate for a single-family residence at 6910 Sandtrack Road, situated on the east
<br />side of Sandtrack Road northerly of Caulfield Court, in Zone RC: to allow an approxi-
<br />mately six-foot-high block wall and an approximately 12-foot-high gate within the re-
<br />quired 30-foot front yard setback where a maximum height of three feet is permitted,
<br />Zoning Case V-92-901. The hearing had been continued from January 8, 1991, to allow
<br />Councilman Buster to view the property. Following a brief discussion, the hearing was
<br />officially closed. The appeal was granted, subject to the conditions listed in the at-
<br />tachment to the communication from the Board of Administrative Appeals and Zoning Adjust-
<br />ment pertaining to this case; it was determined that the granting of a variance, 'subject
<br />to the reco~nended conditions, would not have a significant adverse impact on the envt-
<br />ror~nent; the staff report and the envtromnental assessment were adopted as findings; and
<br />Resolution No. 17673 of the Clty Council of the City of Riverside, California, Rendering
<br />Its Decision Granting a Variance, was presented; and the tltle having been read, and fur-
<br />ther reading waived by the unanimous consent of Councilmembers present, was adopted.
<br />
<br />Motion
<br />Second
<br />All Ayes
<br />
<br />Motion
<br />Second
<br />All Ayes
<br />
<br />IXI
<br />I' I
<br />
<br />76-267
<br />
<br />
<br />
|