Laserfiche WebLink
Morton, Sherry <br /> From: Dvonne Pitruzzello <devopitz @sbcglobal.net> <br /> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 6:40 AM <br /> To: Letitia Pepper <br /> Cc: Bailey, Rusty; Gardner, Mike; Melendrez,Andy; MacArthur, Chris; Davis, Paul; Soubirous, <br /> Mike; Perry,Jim; Burnard,John; Russo,John A.; Geuss, Gary; Morton, Sherry; Alicia <br /> Robinson; Cassie MacDuff; Letters;Thirtymiles Corruption <br /> Subject: [External] Re: Update on Corruption Investigation into "Pot Permits" and How They Are <br /> Being Issued in the City of Sacramento <br /> Don't forget the public utilities director trying to sell off our water to a co-op, monopoly because we have more <br /> than enough water and are can sell it at a higher rate. did city council know of this proposition that the public <br /> utilities director agreed to, he should have been fired. If the city manager won't fire him over this then the city <br /> council should fire the city manager. The history and strength of riverside has been in it's public utility and now <br /> we are trying to sell it off by some carpet baggers here for a stop along the way to pension heaven. I think not <br /> maybe we need to talk about this. <br /> Sent from my iPhone <br /> On May 8, 2016, at 11:07 PM, Letitia Pepper<letitiapepper @yahoo.com> wrote: <br /> Hon. Mayor, City Council, City Attorney, City Manager and Madame Clerk: <br /> I have had three responses to my request for information on who is negotiating letting a limited number <br /> of medical marijuana dispensaries open. (i.e., creating an oligopoly which will make prices for marijuana <br /> higher, which in turn will fuel the black market). <br /> Council Member Melendrez responded that what he said at the Brownie Mary Democratic Club <br /> meeting wasn't any different than what he said from the dais when the Council voted to let patients grow 8 <br /> plants (I disagree with his memory), and Council members Soubirous and Gardner said that they weren't <br /> engaged in any such negotiations. <br /> The City Manager has said he's in favor of letting dispensaries open because--and I may be <br /> paraphrasing here --the City is broke and could use the money. Would it be okay, City Charter-wise, if <br /> he was negotiating such a deal without checking with the City Council first? Have any of you asked him <br /> about this? <br /> Because if I think it would look suspicious for the City to make such a deal after all the time and money <br /> it spent closing dispensaries, working against the citizens' initiative to let 10 of the prior dispensaries re- <br /> open, taking a case all the way to the California Supreme Court, and generally acting like Prop. 215 <br /> doesn't exist, imagine how suspicious it might look to the people charged with investigating corruption? <br /> That's what this update is about. <br /> The City of Sacramento just got hit with a letter from a group of concerned attorneys at a large, old <br /> Sacramento law firm seeking public records related to the Fox News show on the Green Rush and how <br /> "pot permits" are being handed out in violation of that City's existing ordinances. Inquiring minds want to <br /> know: what would motivate city officials to violate their own, hard-fought for laws? <br /> As if that wasn't bad enough, this attorney request was followed by an in-person visit from the FBI, <br /> demanding similar records. <br /> In case anyone is becoming more interested in the story about the City of Sacramento, here's the story <br /> and the video of some of the Fox show's investigation. On it, you will see the reporter ask a City <br /> employee about about a particular situation, and you will see the employee foolishly lie about something <br /> that is a matter of public record. As an attorney, let me say you can't pay enough for this kind of evidence <br /> of political malfeasance! <br /> The City has its hands full with other problems. It's broke, yet its elected officials are asking for not <br /> only a significant raise, but the creation of a wickedly expensive duplication of the DA's office. It's been <br /> caught trying to turn a Superfund-eligible site into a housing development, inclduig a neighborhood park, <br /> in order to help a developer who's give plenty of campaign contributions to--you guessed it--council <br /> members.. It's been overcharging its ratepayers, and just got sued over that, with more to come. It <br /> 1 <br />