Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />s <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />•9 <br />10 <br />d II <br />O <br />O ^ <br />O o, 12 <br />0 13 <br />6�cai 14 <br />° 15 <br />�aLU LU <br />C <br />C a 16 <br />y N <br />.00 <br />vM 17 <br />O <br />v <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />(together, "the City'l were represented by Michael G. Colantuono and Ryan as Dunn of <br />Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC, Respondent Riverside County Registrar of Voters was <br />represented by Ronak N. Patel, Deputy County Counsel. <br />Having considered all the evidence and written and oral arguments, the Court finds good <br />cause exists to order as follows: <br />WHEREAS the Court ruled on the evidentiary objections submitted by the City as <br />documented in the attached Order on Evidentiary Objections; and <br />WHEREAS the Court finds the title and/or impartial summary given to Measure A by the <br />City of Riverside false, misleading, or inconsistent with the requirements of the Elections Code, <br />requiring amendment. <br />IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: <br />1 • That the title and impartial analysis for Measure A be amended as set forth in the <br />attached exhibit; <br />IT IS SO OR_DERFD. <br />SATED: Ap�ri $, 2016 <br />080.1 ] ORDER AFTER HEARING ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE <br />