Laserfiche WebLink
(„ t urn <br />Public Comment for February 5, 2016 <br />Board of Public Utilities Meeting <br />Prepared by the PU Admin Office at 3:30 p.m. on February 4, 2016 <br />Ciprnmeil <br />3. Public Comment Period - This is the portion of the meeting <br />specifically set aside to invite your comments regarding any matters <br />within the jurisdiction of the Riverside Public Utilities Board - Individual <br />audience participation is limited to 3 minutes and you will be asked to <br />state your name and city of residence. Please complete and submit a <br />speaker card to the Board Secretary. <br />6. REPORT ON THE EXAMINATION OF NORTHSIDE PROPERTY <br />1TRANSACTIONS TO BE PRESENTED BY AUDITORS,, BAKER TILLY <br />VIRCHOW KRAUSE, LLP <br />That the Board of Public Utilities recommend that the City Council: <br />1. Receive and file the Report on Northside Property Transactions; <br />and <br />2. Direct staff to implement any recommendations proposed by the <br />auditors in their report. <br />(presentation by Baker Tilly - 10 min) <br />Jason <br />Hunter <br />You guys are off your rockers implementing Utility 2.0 last week before the Council <br />has even approved it. Secondly, you don't have the authority to operate as a telecom <br />utility. Third, the recycled water project you approved provides me personally with no <br />benefit, and hence violates Prop 218 and 26. Y'all are poking the bear, 2016 is <br />going to be a fun year. for me, RPU should recommend having me run its Office of <br />Ratepayer Advocacy just so I can keep you guys from destroying this utility, which is <br />a tremendous community asset. <br />Jason <br />Hunter <br />Report does not address ANY of my concerns in my letter of 1014114 to this Board <br />regarding AB Brown, Reid Park, or the former Riverside Golf Course. Report does <br />not mention the lack of appraisal accompanying the 2009 transfer of Pellisier Ranch <br />Woods Streets back to the utility from the General Fund. I sent an email and made a telephone call <br />to the consultant to raise these issues, but Baker Tilly has not gotten back to me, <br />Given these facts, I am somewhat skeptical that the consultant is qualified for this job <br />and most likely the further audits they'll be conducting. <br />