Laserfiche WebLink
W A T E R E N E R G Y L I 1 k <br /> RIVERSIDE PUBLIC UTILITIES <br /> OW& Board Memorandum <br /> PUBLIC UTILITIES <br /> BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES DATE: May 18, 2012 <br /> ITEM NO: B <br /> SUBJECT: WATER RESEARCH FOUNDATION FUNDING OPPORTUNITY FOR EVALUATING THE <br /> COST OF TREATMENT FOR HE]CAVALENT CHROMIUM [Cr(VQ] <br /> ISSUE: <br /> That the Board of Public Utilities consider approval of an application for a grant through the Water Research <br /> Foundation (WRF)to evaluate treatment of Hexavalent Chromium [Cr(VI)] in our water system. <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS: <br /> That the Board of Public Utilities recommend that the City Council: <br /> 1. Approve the submission of a grant application through the Water Research Foundation to evaluate the <br /> treatment of Hexavalent Chromium [Cr(VI)] in the City's water system; and <br /> 2. Commit funding of up to $200,000 to meet the terms of the grant, if awarded. <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> The California Department of Pub4c Health(CD PH)is in the process of establishing a Maximum Contaminant Level <br /> (MCL) for Hexavalent Chromium [Cr(V[)] as a result of the recent establishment of the 0.02 part per billion (ppb) <br /> Public Health Goal(PHG)set by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Nationally,the <br /> U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA)is conducting a Cr(Vi)risk assessment and has also listed Cr(V[) <br /> on its Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule(UCMR3)to determine if a national standard is needed. Several <br /> factors are required to be considered before a state and federal standard may be established for Cr(VI). These <br /> factors include human health effects, analytical measurement capability, occurrence in drinking water sources, <br /> treatment feasibility and technological availability and costs for removal. Both the CDPH and USEPA realize that a <br /> significant knowledge gap exists in all the factors that are critical for developing a state and federal standard for <br /> Cr(V[). <br /> Treatment cost for Cr(VI)removal will be the driving factor in determining a standard for Cr(VI). A recent treatment <br /> cost study conducted in Glendale California concluded that the cost to treat high levels of Cr(V[)would exceed the <br /> combined cost of all the current drinking water regulations. Although this study is important to assess the treatment <br /> of high levels of Cr(VI),it does not accurately depict the average water system with low to moderate levels of Cr(V[). <br /> On May 2, 2012, the WRF issued a request for proposals to conduct additional studies to determine the cost of <br /> Cr(VI)treatment at low to moderate levels. The City of Riverside falls into this category with low levels of Cr(VI)and <br /> total Chromium which is 25 times lower than the current State MCL. Riverside's low level Cr(Vi) and total <br /> Chromium sources would provide critical data in establishing an accurate cost estimate for treating Cr(VI) at low <br /> levels. Riverside proposes to utilize recently developed Cr(VI) technologies to evaluate removal of Cr(VI) at [ow <br /> levels and determine the cost of removal. This data will then be shared with CDPH to aid in the development of a <br /> Cr(VI) MCL. The maximum funding available for this program is$500,000 with a minimum contribution equaling <br /> one-third of funds requested. Staff would like to respond to this proposal for an amount up to the maximum funding <br /> opportunity. The City is seeking project partners that would contribute funding and or in-kind services to help meet <br /> or supplement the City's contribution. The proposal is due June 1, 2012. <br />