Laserfiche WebLink
ISSUE: <br />The item for Board of Public Utilities consideration is approval of a change order in the amount of <br />50 , to the an Bernardino Transmission Pipeline Appurtenance Replacement project. <br />That the Board of Public Utilities approve a change order to the construction agreement with Trautwein <br />Construction, Inc. in the arnount of $100,000 due to unforeseen contingencies encountered during <br />construction of the San Bernardino Transmission Pipeline Appurtenance Replacennent project. <br />in 20,1; the Board. of Public Utilities authorized staff to perform a C-ondition assessment on the San <br />Bernardino Transmission Main. This assessment indicated that a 220 foot long segment of concreete pipe <br />constructed along Waterman Avenue behveen Hospitality Lane and Vanderbilt Way needed to be <br />replaced. On January 17, 2014, the Board approved a project to replace this pipe with 42-inch cement- <br />morl'ar-lined and coated steel pipe and approved a capital expenditure of $876,000 for Work Order No. <br />1320071, which included work by field forces to shutdown, isolate and de-water the transmission main. <br />Included as part of that approval was the award of a construction or to Trautwein Constniction, <br />Inc., in the amount of $657,776 <br />During construction of the pipeline, several unforseen challenges v.,ere encountered. First, the location <br />of one of the system connections was not accurate and required extra potholing to locate, as well as <br />additional piping to complete. Second, there was substantially rnore concrete "M be removed than <br />originally anticipated. These factors were exacerbated by the depth of the pipeline (15 to 20 feet deep) <br />and inaccuracy of the "As-Built,"' plans from the 1920's and 1960's. <br />As a result of these challenges and their associated delays, the connection work was pushed into the <br />warmer season. Because of the configuration of the piping, only 'two of the three connections were <br />needed for the Waterman System to operate at partial capacity. The plan was to make two connections <br />with the Waterman System down and then perform the third connection behind a closed valve with the <br />system in law flow operation. However, it was discovered that the necessary isolating valve was broken <br />and Riverside Public Lltilifi es'(RPU) Field Forces had to complete an emergency valve replacement. As <br />work on the third connection was made, it was discovered that there was an unknown connection frorn <br />the pressurized pipeline to the isolated segment and this required another shutdown of the Waterman <br />System to complete the tie-in work- <br />The additional work completed by the contractor restulted in the projject Work Order exceeding the Board <br />authorized arriount. The additional work done by contractor was approximately $100,000. <br />