Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL/AGENCY <br />LII Y (:UUN(:IL <br />AND <br />RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL <br />IMPROVEMENTS CORPORATION <br />MINUTES <br />• TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 2012, 3 P.M. <br />ART PICK COUNCIL CHAMBER <br />CITY HALL <br />City ofArts Unnovation 3900 MAIN STREET <br />WARDS <br />G <br />A <br />R <br />D <br />E <br />R <br />1 <br />MEMBERS <br />M <br />E <br />L <br />E <br />D <br />R <br />z <br />2 <br />B <br />A <br />I <br />L <br />Y <br />3 <br />D <br />A <br />V <br />I <br />S <br />4 <br />M <br />A <br />C <br />R <br />T <br />U <br />R <br />5 <br />H <br />A <br />R <br />T <br />6 <br />A <br />D <br />A <br />M <br />S <br />7 <br />Roll Call: <br />Present <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />In the absence of Mayor Loveridge, Mayor Pro Tem Davis called the meeting <br />to order at 3 p.m. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING REFERRALS AND APPEALS <br />CASE P10-0316 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - RESOLUTIONS <br />Hearing was called to consider amendments to the Public Safety Element, <br />the Open Space and Conservation Element, and the Public Facilities and <br />Infrastructure Element of the General Plan 2025 to implement the <br />requirements of California State Assembly Bill 162 (AB 162) and to <br />incorporate technical and clarifying changes to the General Plan 2025 <br />Program. No one spoke on the matter. Two letters were presented and <br />considered. The public hearing was officially closed. Following discussion, <br />the City Council (1) determined that the proposed project will not have a <br />significant effect on the environment based on the findings below and <br />adopted the Third Addendum to the Certified Final Program Environmental <br />Impact Report (PEIR) for the General Plan 2025 Program; pursuant to <br />California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162: <br />(a) there are no substantial changes to the project that would require major <br />revisions of the Final PEIR for the Program due to new significant <br />environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts <br />identified in the Final PEIR; (b) no substantial changes have occurred in the <br />circumstances under which the project is being undertaken that will require <br />major revisions of the Final PEIR to disclose new significant environmental <br />effects or that would result in a substantial increase in the severity of the <br />impacts identified in the Final PEIR; and (c) there is no new information of <br />substantial importance, which was not known at the time that the previous <br />Final PEIR was circulated, indicating that: (i) the proposed General Plan <br />Amendment will not have one or more significant effects not previously <br />discussed in the Final PEIR; (ii) there are no impacts that were determined to <br />be significant in the previous Final PEIR that would be substantially more <br />severe; (iii) there are no additional mitigation measures or alternatives to the <br />project that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant effects <br />identified in the previous Final PEIR; and (iv) there are no additional <br />mitigation measures or alternatives which were rejected by the project <br />proponent that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous <br />Final PEIR that would substantially reduce any significant impact identified in <br />the Final PEIR; (2) approved Case P10-0316 based on and subject to the <br />Planning Commission findings as outlined in the written staff report; <br />(3) adopted a resolution amending the General Plan 2025; and (4) adopted a <br />97-229 <br />